Re: [Intel-gfx] Dear Intel: please document SDVO LVDS option block

2011-10-26 Thread 4ernov
Thanks for re-raising, Adam. 2011/10/26 Adam Jackson > On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > I assume the SDVO LVDS options block in the VBT would tell us what bits > > are correct to program here, but intel_bios.h documents only the layout > > of that structure, not its c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Give up on edid retries when i2c bus is not responding

2011-10-26 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
This allows to avoid talking to a non-responding bus repeatedly until we finally timeout after 15 attempts. We can do this by catching the -ENXIO error, provided by i2c_algo_bit:bit_doAddress call. Within the bit_doAddress we already try 3 times to get the edid data, so if the routine tells us tha

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Give up on edid retries when i2c bus is not responding

2011-10-26 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:06:24 -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > This allows to avoid talking to a non-responding bus repeatedly until we > finally timeout after 15 attempts. We can do this by catching the -ENXIO > error, provided by i2c_algo_bit:bit_doAddress call. > > Within the bit_doAddress we al

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Give up on edid retries when i2c bus is not responding

2011-10-26 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
This allows to avoid talking to a non-responding bus repeatedly until we finally timeout after 15 attempts. We can do this by catching the -ENXIO error, provided by i2c_algo_bit:bit_doAddress call. Within the bit_doAddress we already try 3 times to get the edid data, so if the routine tells us tha

[Intel-gfx] Dear Intel: please document SDVO LVDS option block

2011-10-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > I assume the SDVO LVDS options block in the VBT would tell us what bits > are correct to program here, but intel_bios.h documents only the layout > of that structure, not its content. Or, we can hope that the SDVO card > set it up correctly

Re: [Intel-gfx] what is the adress of current intel drm git?

2011-10-26 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:08, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Hallo all, > > > I was not testing intel drm git for some moths now, > what is the actual current correct git? > This one seems to be down: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=**linux/kernel/git/keithp/linux-** > 2.6.git;a=summary