Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.0 (or SNA?) regression: failed to train DP, aborting

2011-07-23 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > I have a Q67 (DQ67SW board) attached to a Dell U2711 via DP.  In > previous kernels, the DP link has worked flawlessly.  I just booted > 3.0-final and simultaneously enabled SNA, and now when my screen goes > to sleep I don't get an image

[Intel-gfx] 3.0 (or SNA?) regression: failed to train DP, aborting

2011-07-23 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
I have a Q67 (DQ67SW board) attached to a Dell U2711 via DP. In previous kernels, the DP link has worked flawlessly. I just booted 3.0-final and simultaneously enabled SNA, and now when my screen goes to sleep I don't get an image back until I power cycle the monitor. dmesg says: [drm:intel_dp_c

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

2011-07-23 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:10:53AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:08:14AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > > >> > You're right, of course -- UMS i