On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:14:53 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 23 +++
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:14:52 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
And programmer hints too. They serve as useful documentation on the
expected usage of the variable as well. But maybe that's just me...
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Ben Widawsky writes:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:03:14PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:14:52 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> >
> > > -static int i915_modeset =3D -1;
> > > +static int i915_modeset __read_mostly =3D -1;
> >
> > What effect does this have? Performance? Code si
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:16:01 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> I've seen no regressions on Nexuiz.
'this doesn't seem to hurt any' is hardly a strong recommendation...
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp3gwbqzSTIA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:03:14PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:14:52 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>
>
> > -static int i915_modeset = -1;
> > +static int i915_modeset __read_mostly = -1;
>
> What effect does this have? Performance? Code size? More warnings?
__read_mostly
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:14:52 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> -static int i915_modeset = -1;
> +static int i915_modeset __read_mostly = -1;
What effect does this have? Performance? Code size? More warnings?
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpVFVofyIu2e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 23 +++
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index f5ef954..feac0f9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
++
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 24
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 20 ++--
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 6
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 03:15:07PM +0100, Jools Wills wrote:
> On 01/07/11 21:35, Jools Wills wrote:
> > I have reported a bug over at the kernel bugtracker
> >
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38492
>
> no devs have a comment or advice regarding this issue ?
AFAIK, nobody has had
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:27:35 -0700
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:22:51 -0700, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > Especially after a hotplug or power status change, the sink may not
> > reply immediately to a link status query. So retry 3 times per the spec
> > to really make sure nothing
Hi Chris,
yes! you did it again :)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: "Chris Wilson"
Gesendet: Jul 6, 2011 2:06:38 PM
An: "Nicolas Kalkhof" , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Betreff: Re: [Intel-gfx] gen6 (SNB) fonts are completely garbled with latest
xf86-video-intel GIT
>Fixed.
>-Chris
Fixed.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Hi,latest xf86-video-intel completely trashes all fonts on my system with sna enabled. xorg.log reveals nothing interesting.any ideas?regardsnic Schon gehört? WEB.DE hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die Toolbar eingebaut! http://produkte.web.de/go/toolbar
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
