Re: [Intel-gfx] Another GPU hang

2011-05-21 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:45:24PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2011 00:08:10 +0300, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm not sure why I'm getting this. I've performed a lot of configuration > > changes, so can't be sure, which one causes. I've switched to amd64 > > distro

Re: [Intel-gfx] Another GPU hang

2011-05-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, 22 May 2011 00:08:10 +0300, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure why I'm getting this. I've performed a lot of configuration > changes, so can't be sure, which one causes. I've switched to amd64 > distro and upgraded everything to latest debian unstable. Also I'm on > 2.6.39 no

[Intel-gfx] Another GPU hang

2011-05-21 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Hi, I'm not sure why I'm getting this. I've performed a lot of configuration changes, so can't be sure, which one causes. I've switched to amd64 distro and upgraded everything to latest debian unstable. Also I'm on 2.6.39 now. I'm getting such hang sometimes just after unplugging HDMI cable from

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote: > The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate > locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell > Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB, > I can quite conf

Re: [Intel-gfx] Heap corruption regression in 2.15.0

2011-05-21 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 05/18/2011 01:23 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > It looks like the problematic commit is one of: > > e1ff5182304e00c0d392092069422cae7626cf8d Handle drawable/client > destruction in pending swaps/flips > > 86f23f21ab57fcbc031bcd2b8f432a08ff4cc320 Skip client and drawable >resource delete

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sat, 21 May 2011 11:23:53 -0400, "Luke-Jr" wrote: > On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > > > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael > > > Wysocki to the message ] > > > > > > On Fri, May 2

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki > to the message ] > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > > > I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago > > against 2.6

Re: [Intel-gfx] "MTRR allocation failed. Graphics performance may suffer" message

2011-05-21 Thread Christophe Chabanois
Same thing here for my MSI H67MA-E45 motherboard. Stuff about MTRR in kernel logs : [0.00] DMI: MSI MS-7678/H67MA-E45 (MS-7678), BIOS V1.6 02/15/2011 [0.00] e820 update range: - 0001 (usable) ==> (reserved) [0.00] e820 remove range: 000