Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Remove the memory of Option "AccelMethod"

2011-05-10 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 10 May 2011 15:27:45 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson Wow, that was still around? Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt pgpe9y8jC9O0d.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Update the location of the ringbuffers' HWS_PGA registers for IVB.

2011-05-10 Thread Xiang, Haihao
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 02:24 +0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > They have been moved from the ringbuffer groups to their own group it > looks like. Fixes GPU hangs on gnome startup. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |3 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_r

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: color range only works on pre-ILK

2011-05-10 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 10 May 2011 14:16:57 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > That's in patch 7/7, you want me to combine this fix with the feature > addition for ILK+? No, I'm good with separate patches, just want to see the patch described correctly. -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgpO7yVWkT3rA.pgp Description:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: clarify IS_GEN vs IS_ usage

2011-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:45:54 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2011 11:42:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > This feels like a lot of churn to me, for the pre-gen4 chipsets at > least. gen2 is always is_830_display (which is overly specific), and > gen3 is always is_i915_display. The ar

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: split out Ironlake pipe bpp picking code

2011-05-10 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:12:38 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Figuring out which pipe bpp to use is a bit painful. It depends on both > the encoder and display configuration attached to a pipe. For instance, > to drive a 24bpp framebuffer out to an 18bpp panel, we need to use 6bpc > on the pipe but

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: color range only works on pre-ILK

2011-05-10 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 10 May 2011 14:16:57 -0700 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2011 14:12:48 -0700 > Keith Packard wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:12:35 -0700, Jesse Barnes > > wrote: > > > > > ILK+ provides this feature in the transcoder and pipe configuration > > > instead. > > > > This does

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: color range only works on pre-ILK

2011-05-10 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 10 May 2011 14:12:48 -0700 Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:12:35 -0700, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > > ILK+ provides this feature in the transcoder and pipe configuration > > instead. > > This doesn't seem to add in a new implementation of this feature for > ILK, just stops

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: color range only works on pre-ILK

2011-05-10 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:12:35 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > ILK+ provides this feature in the transcoder and pipe configuration > instead. This doesn't seem to add in a new implementation of this feature for ILK, just stops using the pre-ILK version on ILK. Please explain how this is sufficient?

[Intel-gfx] drm intel maintainership

2011-05-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Keith and Chris, I'm a bit confused about drm-intel maintainership. Please clarify. And if drm-intel mainterships switches permanently to Keith, please send out a proper announcement and a corresponding patch to MAINTAINERS. Yours, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch - +41 (0) 79

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Remove the memory of Option "AccelMethod"

2011-05-10 Thread Adam Jackson
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson --- src/intel_driver.c |2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/intel_driver.c b/src/intel_driver.c index b79f8c9..8666421 100644 --- a/src/intel_driver.c +++ b/src/intel_driver.c @@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTW

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: clarify IS_GEN vs IS_ usage

2011-05-10 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 9 May 2011 11:42:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 05 May 2011 23:57:56 +0100 > Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 May 2011 15:16:45 -0700, Jesse Barnes > > wrote: > > > We generally use the gen number to indicate the generation of the render > > > portion of the chip. In som

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Update the location of the ringbuffers' HWS_PGA registers for IVB.

2011-05-10 Thread Eric Anholt
They have been moved from the ringbuffer groups to their own group it looks like. Fixes GPU hangs on gnome startup. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 27 --- 2 files changed, 27

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] EGL: Add hardware cursor image format for EGL image extension.

2011-05-10 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
I implemented this just a few days ago: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=e5169e9615e8391ea369415b356168717b8f7be0 It's a new use flags instead of a new format, because, well, it's not a new pixel format, but a restriction on how the buffers should be allocated. Kristian On Tue,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] EGL: Add hardware cursor image format for EGL image extension.

2011-05-10 Thread zhigang gong
Current EGL only support one drm buffer format which is EGL_DRM_BUFFER_FORMAT_ARGB32_MESA. This format works fine with normal image, but if we want to create a drm buffer which will be used for a hardware cursor, then it has problem. The default behaviou for this format is