Re: [Intel-gfx] X11 performance regressions

2011-05-09 Thread Chris Wilson
As a point of comparison, here are the similar results with master of all the various trees on my 1.6GHz N450 (Atom+PineView) [so not strictly an apples-to-apples comparison, your CPU is about 4-5x faster, but PNV is about 3-4x faster than the 915GM (clock-for-clock)]: On Sun, 08 May 2011 20:22:21

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] intel-gen4asm: modernization

2011-05-09 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 6 May 2011 11:34:25 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > I attempted to merge the assembler into the modern age. Ideally we should be > able to push the changes back into mesa since it appears Haihao added some > relevant structs. > > I've only done very limited testing on this for my usecase

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: clarify IS_GEN vs IS_ usage

2011-05-09 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, 9 May 2011 11:42:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 05 May 2011 23:57:56 +0100 > Chris Wilson wrote: > > Whilst you are in the vicinity, does it make sense to rename info->gen to > > info->render (or info->render_gen)? > > Sure. Ok, that really does reveal in how many locations we

Re: [Intel-gfx] X11 performance regressions

2011-05-09 Thread Adam Jackson
On 5/8/11 2:22 PM, Knut Petersen wrote: Software === 1.86 MHz system: opensuse 11.2 X.Org X Server 1.6.5 Release Date: 2009-10-11 kernel 2.6.38.5 2.00 MHz system: opensuse 11.4 X.Org X Server 1.10.99 git-tree, 2011-may-7 kernel 2.6.39-rc4-drm-intel-staging I'd start by suspecting differen

Re: [Intel-gfx] Sandy Bridge (i7/H67) and connected screens

2011-05-09 Thread Robert Kaiser
Robert Kaiser schrieb: I really hope you/we can find a solution to this! As there was no reaction, I filed https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37010 to have this tracked. Robert Kaiser ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedeskto