Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel-gtt: fix memory corruption with GM965 and >4GB RAM

2011-02-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:46:35PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Actually, on style points I prefer your patch: The hw status page is > > allocated with drm_pci_alloc which calls dma_alloc_coherent, so setting > > the coherent mask is sufficient. The dma mask set in the gtt is > > essentially usele

Re: [Intel-gfx] Difference in dot clock between xserver 1.5.2 and 1.9.4 - intel driver

2011-02-28 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 03:54:24 -0800 (PST), SD wrote: > (II) intel(0): using SSC reference clock of 96 MHz That's the spread-spectrum clock reference value; it forms the basis From which the actual dot clock is computed using a PLL. It is *not* the actual dot clock. > [ 135.556] (II) intel(0):

Re: [Intel-gfx] Trying to compile drivers to the Acer Aspire One 532h

2011-02-28 Thread Nicolau Werneck
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 05:53:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 13:45:20 -0300, Nicolau Werneck wrote: > > > $ sudo grep -i "glx\|drm" /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > (II) "glx" will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also > > specified in the config file. > > (II) LoadMo

[Intel-gfx] Difference in dot clock between xserver 1.5.2 and 1.9.4 (intel driver)

2011-02-28 Thread SD
Dear All I have ONE laptop with ONE hdd and 2 OS - opensuse and fedora on it. When I boot opensuse LCD picture is perfect but is not on fedora. I spent many times to find a differences and want to show to you all this one: X.Org X Server 1.5.2 Release Date: 10 October 2008 X Protocol Version 11,

[Intel-gfx] Difference in dot clock between xserver 1.5.2 and 1.9.4 - intel driver

2011-02-28 Thread SD
Dear All I have ONE laptop with ONE hdd and 2 OS - opensuse and fedora on it. When I boot opensuse LCD picture is perfect but is not on fedora. My video is i915GM. I would like to show one difference in xorg log: X.Org X Server 1.5.2 Release Date: 10 October 2008 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0