Re: [Intel-gfx] External display

2011-01-16 Thread Ivan Bulatovic
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 18:27 +0100, Damnshock wrote: > On Sunday 16 January 2011 18:14:10 Ivan Bulatovic wrote: > > What does xrandr -q say when notebook is on docking station ? > > I have no dock, just the lid closed and happen to use an external monitor. > Does that matter? > > Regards No, not

Re: [Intel-gfx] External display

2011-01-16 Thread Damnshock
On Sunday 16 January 2011 18:14:10 Ivan Bulatovic wrote: > What does xrandr -q say when notebook is on docking station ? I have no dock, just the lid closed and happen to use an external monitor. Does that matter? Regards ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Int

Re: [Intel-gfx] External display

2011-01-16 Thread Ivan Bulatovic
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 17:31 +0100, Damnshock wrote: > On Friday 14 January 2011 18:58:25 Damnshock wrote: > > On Friday 14 January 2011 14:57:57 Ivan Bulatovic wrote: > > > > > You can always boot with video=LVDS-1:d kernel parameter, that will > > > disable your LVDS connection and run your exter

Re: [Intel-gfx] External display

2011-01-16 Thread Damnshock
On Friday 14 January 2011 18:58:25 Damnshock wrote: > On Friday 14 January 2011 14:57:57 Ivan Bulatovic wrote: > > > You can always boot with video=LVDS-1:d kernel parameter, that will > > disable your LVDS connection and run your external monitor in native > > resolution. > > Thanks for the tric

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] drm/i915/execbuffer: Reorder binding of objects to favour restrictions

2011-01-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:55:57 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 16.01.2011, 14:53 + schrieb Chris Wilson: > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:38:34 +0100, Alexey Fisher > > wrote: > > > Hi Chris, > > > did you got my regression report? > > > > It appears you didn't get my response saying

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] drm/i915/execbuffer: Reorder binding of objects to favour restrictions

2011-01-16 Thread Alexey Fisher
Am Sonntag, den 16.01.2011, 14:53 + schrieb Chris Wilson: > On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:38:34 +0100, Alexey Fisher > wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > did you got my regression report? > > It appears you didn't get my response saying Linus had already pulled the > fix. > -Chris > Ah, ok. Then the fix i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] drm/i915/execbuffer: Reorder binding of objects to favour restrictions

2011-01-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:38:34 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Hi Chris, > did you got my regression report? It appears you didn't get my response saying Linus had already pulled the fix. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ In

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] drm/i915/execbuffer: Reorder binding of objects to favour restrictions

2011-01-16 Thread Alexey Fisher
Hi Chris, did you got my regression report? Am Freitag, den 14.01.2011, 16:11 +0100 schrieb Alexey Fisher: > Hi Chris, > > i have new regression after this patch. Like usual, artifakts, > disappearing icons, with only one difference gl seems to work ok. > > see screencast in attachment. > > My

Re: [Intel-gfx] Binary add-ins for Arrandale

2011-01-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:36:09 +0530, Madura Anushanga wrote: > Hi, > I'm in doubt whether there are optional binary-only add-ins for the intel > graphics driver for Linux that will make it's performance increase. It seems > to lack the features and performance that are present in the binary-only >

[Intel-gfx] Binary add-ins for Arrandale

2011-01-16 Thread Madura Anushanga
Hi, I'm in doubt whether there are optional binary-only add-ins for the intel graphics driver for Linux that will make it's performance increase. It seems to lack the features and performance that are present in the binary-only Windows driver. Is there a choice for users of Linux that are not stric

Re: [Intel-gfx] External display

2011-01-16 Thread Christoph Lukas
Hi Chris, > > > > I am using a Dell E6410 notebook running Ubuntu. Most of the time I am > > running this notebook in a docking station with closed lid and with an > > external (DVI) monitor attached to the dock. > > > > Running different kernels I see different behaviour regarding the > > displ