Re: [Intel-gfx] Help-On frame Buffer

2010-12-09 Thread Bruno Prémont
Hi Sanjay, Note, please keep list CCed and avoid HTML e-mails. In addition, inlining (without line wrapping) the log snippled would have been preferred (easier to replying). On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:43:18 sanjay anvekar wrote: > Hi Bruno, > Thanks for your reply. > Attached is the ouput of ("dm

Re: [Intel-gfx] i965 / i915 and what else?

2010-12-09 Thread Journeyer Hum
Hi Chris and people on this list, Thank you for your kind answer. I understood that there is i915, i965 and some other generations of chipsets. And I've been told that there is i915 linux frame buffer driver(as a kernel module). My question is if there is another frame buffer driver for i965 chi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: render p-state support for Sandybridge

2010-12-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
Note: this patch is just for comments/testing, it should not be integrated at this time. This seems to be enough to initialize render p-state support and get up/down interrupts (though I've only confirmed down interrupts so far). There's code in there for requesting a frequency change, but it see

Re: [Intel-gfx] please revert 869184a675662bddcdf76c5b95665272facff2b8 ASAP

2010-12-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:05:44 + (UTC) Joep Daandels wrote: > Chris Wilson chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: > > > > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:06:23 +1000, Dave Airlie gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > drm/i915/dp: use VBT provided eDP params if available > > > > > > Looks like trusting the BIOS is a b

Re: [Intel-gfx] please revert 869184a675662bddcdf76c5b956 65272facff2b8 ASAP

2010-12-09 Thread Joep Daandels
Chris Wilson chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:06:23 +1000, Dave Airlie gmail.com> > wrote: > > drm/i915/dp: use VBT provided eDP params if available > > > > Looks like trusting the BIOS is a bad plan, also that commit seems to > > do a lot more than just use some VBT val

Re: [Intel-gfx] [TERRIBLE PATCH] Re: [regression?] i915 generating wakeups even when idle

2010-12-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:32:04 -0500 Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:47:52 -0500 > > Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:33:20 -0500 > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [TERRIBLE PATCH] Re: [regression?] i915 generating wakeups even when idle

2010-12-09 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:47:52 -0500 > Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes >> wrote: >> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:33:20 -0500 >> > Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Andrew

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Fix I2C/EDID handling with active DisplayPort to DVI converter

2010-12-09 Thread David Flynn
* Chris Wilson (ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk) wrote: > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:10:21 +, David Flynn wrote: > > This fixes broken EDID reading when using an active DisplayPort to > > duallink DVI converter. If the AUX CH replier chooses to defer the > > transaction, a short read occurs and erroneous

Re: [Intel-gfx] [TERRIBLE PATCH] Re: [regression?] i915 generating wakeups even when idle

2010-12-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:47:52 -0500 Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:33:20 -0500 > > Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Chris

Re: [Intel-gfx] [TERRIBLE PATCH] Re: [regression?] i915 generating wakeups even when idle

2010-12-09 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:33:20 -0500 > Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Chris Wilson >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:31:24 -0500, Andrew Lutomi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [TERRIBLE PATCH] Re: [regression?] i915 generating wakeups even when idle

2010-12-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:33:20 -0500 Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Chris Wilson > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:31:24 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Andrew Lutom

Re: [Intel-gfx] i965 / i915 and what else?

2010-12-09 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:53:22 +0900, Journeyer Hum wrote: > Hello, > > I am now investigating the rendering capability of Android-x86. > As you might know, android-x86 currently uses i915 for the frame buffer > driver. > So it supports GMA earlier than X3100(965GM). If you are only interested in t

[Intel-gfx] i965 / i915 and what else?

2010-12-09 Thread Journeyer Hum
Hello, I am now investigating the rendering capability of Android-x86. As you might know, android-x86 currently uses i915 for the frame buffer driver. So it supports GMA earlier than X3100(965GM). I have seen i965 from the url below. http://intellinuxgraphics.org/index.html Is i965 the one afte