Re: [Intel-gfx] Versions required for h264 acceleration on Intel HD chipset

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 02:01 +0800, Pedro Ribeiro wrote: > Hi all, > > tomorrow I will be getting my new shiny new laptop, a T410 with an > Intel HD graphics adapter. > > Currently I'm using Debian testing (soon to become stable) with these > packages: > - intel xorg driver 2.13 > - cairo 1.8.10

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm: record monitor status in output_poll_execute

On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:27:43 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote: > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:45:59 -0800 > Keith Packard wrote: > > > In order to correctly report monitor connected status changes, the > > previous monitor status must be recorded in the connector->status > > value instead of being discarde

[Intel-gfx] Versions required for h264 acceleration on Intel HD chipset

Hi all, tomorrow I will be getting my new shiny new laptop, a T410 with an Intel HD graphics adapter. Currently I'm using Debian testing (soon to become stable) with these packages: - intel xorg driver 2.13 - cairo 1.8.10 - libdrm 2.4.21 - mesa 7.7.1 - libva 1.0.1 - xorg server 1.7.7 I always us

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm: record monitor status in output_poll_execute

On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:45:59 -0800 Keith Packard wrote: > In order to correctly report monitor connected status changes, the > previous monitor status must be recorded in the connector->status > value instead of being discarded. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard Keith, am I right to assume that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Dont use hardware acceleration on Sandybridge rev 07 hardware or earlier.

We had two independent reports of rev07 failing even with the BLT workaround in place, so I applied the patch. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedeskto