I have a situation where unplugging an external monitor and running an
xrandr sequence to return the screen to the internal display sometimes
causes the i915 driver to wig out.
In perusing the intel-gfx archives, I see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2010-May/006957.html makes a
re
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:41:45 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Find a hw engineer, and ask him nicely why his ringbuffer registers return
> 0 *most* of the time.
Ugh.
> Having the error there was to make sure people noticed and I
> could find out just how many SNB revisions failed. I presume you hav
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:03:45 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> The commit below causes my Sandybridge system to fail at initial KMS
> initialization:
>
> Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099032] i915 :00:02.0: irq 42 for
> MSI/M
> SI-X
> Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099086] [drm:init_ri
On 2010-11-04 13:41- Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:37:01 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Also, the intel-gfx list is moderated with auto-rejection. Do I really
need to subscribe to the list just to get a mail through?
A few of the Intel gfx engineers are at Plumbers. If you tell J
The commit below causes my Sandybridge system to fail at initial KMS
initialization:
Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099032] i915 :00:02.0: irq 42 for MSI/M
SI-X
Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099086] [drm:init_ring_common] *ERROR*
render ring initialization failed ctl hea
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:41 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:37:01 -0400, Jon Masters
> wrote:
> > Also, the intel-gfx list is moderated with auto-rejection. Do I really
> > need to subscribe to the list just to get a mail through?
>
> A few of the Intel gfx engineers are at P
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:37:01 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> Also, the intel-gfx list is moderated with auto-rejection. Do I really
> need to subscribe to the list just to get a mail through?
A few of the Intel gfx engineers are at Plumbers. If you tell Jesse about
it, he may be able to convince the
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:44:39 +0800, "Liu, Yuanhan" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 22:55 +0800, Liu Aleaxander wrote:
> >
> > > Being able to trace the register writes using ftrace is good... In fact we
> > > can remove our own printks and just use mmiotrace. So is it possible to
> > > post-proce
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:50:24 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> Chris, I try to retest your changed version on drm-intel-staging.
> It looks things work fine now with that. ;)
>
> Sorry that I'm not quite sure why my last test failed...please pick that
> one to -fixes, so QA team could pick it up for val
