On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 04:35 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Lost of bisecting and backporting later.. and I've identified the bad
> commit:
>
> 9220434a8768902cd9cf248709972678b74aa8c1 drm/i915: Only emit a flush
> request on the active ring.
A minimal fix is this:
commit 78342e8fd01614ac0507db1f
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 20:29 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:10:44 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > As an additional data-point, with the bug manifesting, if you go to
> > "expose" mode, (Win+E for default config), you find the corruption is
> > absent. It only appears to be pres
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:48 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Non-fastforward of drm-intel-next
>
> Hi Chris,
Sorry.. meant to 'CC you, and appear to have dropped your email in the
subject line.
I hope this doesn't get you too much more spam through the address being
prominently visible in mail arch
Non-fastforward of drm-intel-next
Hi Chris,
I was looking at logs of the drm-intel-next branch, and noted that one
of the commits:
commit b5dc608c98d929abbf2fe932ed07b3c868d83342
Author: Chris Wilson
Date: Wed Oct 20 20:59:57 2010 +0100
drm/i915: Copy the updated reloc->presumed_offset b
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 20:29 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:10:44 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > As an additional data-point, with the bug manifesting, if you go to
> > "expose" mode, (Win+E for default config), you find the corruption is
> > absent. It only appears to be pres
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 20:29 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> My guess is that it is a double application of the drawable offset when
> doing a CopyRegion swapbuffers. Does the corruption move in relation to
> the window as it moves?
Yes, it appears to. Relative to the screen, (and just squinting at i
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:10:44 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> As an additional data-point, with the bug manifesting, if you go to
> "expose" mode, (Win+E for default config), you find the corruption is
> absent. It only appears to be present when the glxgears window is not
> scaled by the window mana
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 14:39 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:53:16 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I was wondering whether anyone has tried the latest stack of drivers
> > with compiz running?
> >
> > I'm running the Ubuntu Xorg edgers PPA with a home-brew bac
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 14:39 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:53:16 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I was wondering whether anyone has tried the latest stack of drivers
> > with compiz running?
> >
> > I'm running the Ubuntu Xorg edgers PPA with a home-brew
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:58:19 -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
> Somebody recently pointed us to the intel-legacy driver which is GEM-less:
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/xf86-video-intel/commit/?h=legacy
>
> In the FreeBSD/PC-BSD world this interests us quite a bit, since we
> don't have
> GEM /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody recently pointed us to the intel-legacy driver which is GEM-less:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/xf86-video-intel/commit/?h=legacy
In the FreeBSD/PC-BSD world this interests us quite a bit, since we
don't have
GEM / KMS in our kernel as
Hi,
> Try fbpercrtc=1 as a kernel option
This options seems to be a no-op since commit 785b93ef.
Maybe drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe() can be tweaked for
that, or maybe there's already an option for it?
Thanks,
Ali
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx
On Thursday 21 October 2010 23:29:15 Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> Is it possible to have two inteldrmfb devices (/dev/fb[01])
> for two output ports using i915 without xorg?
>
> If not, is it possible to force the default inteldrmfb output
> port? Here I want my framebuffer size match my netbook's
>
Am Freitag, den 22.10.2010, 14:39 +0100 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:53:16 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I was wondering whether anyone has tried the latest stack of drivers
> > with compiz running?
> >
> > I'm running the Ubuntu Xorg edgers PPA with a home-b
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:53:16 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was wondering whether anyone has tried the latest stack of drivers
> with compiz running?
>
> I'm running the Ubuntu Xorg edgers PPA with a home-brew backport of
> drm-intel-next against the 2.6.35 ubuntu kernel. That was
>> I am having a Intel box with 945GSE chipset.
>> And I have a legacy application which runs on RHEL4.2 / GNOME.
>> The standard (in-built) Intel driver is working fine for GNOME
>> But I found the (dual) display is not operating successfully.
>> Please advise how to re-build the driver 'cause
16 matches
Mail list logo
