Re: [Intel-gfx] Interrupt latency on some 945GM platforms

2010-09-26 Thread Alexander Lam
2010/9/26 Shaohua Li > 2010/9/26 Stefan Biereigel : > > Am 24.09.2010 21:51, schrieb Jesse Barnes: > >> > >> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:48:36 +0300 > >> Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > >> > >>> On 24 of September 2010 22:39:01 Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:06:46 +0300 > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-26 Thread Nasa
- "The Fungi" wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:26:21AM +, Nasa wrote: > > 800x480 is what I am/should be attempting to get... > [...] > > I apologize for not following the thread too closely but if you're > just looking for working 800x...@60 timings, this is the native > resolution

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-26 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:26:21AM +, Nasa wrote: > 800x480 is what I am/should be attempting to get... [...] I apologize for not following the thread too closely but if you're just looking for working 800x...@60 timings, this is the native resolution of the panel on my Asus EEE PC and xrandr

Re: [Intel-gfx] Interrupt latency on some 945GM platforms

2010-09-26 Thread Shaohua Li
2010/9/26 Stefan Biereigel : >  Am 24.09.2010 21:51, schrieb Jesse Barnes: >> >> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:48:36 +0300 >> Vasily Khoruzhick  wrote: >> >>> On 24 of September 2010 22:39:01 Jesse Barnes wrote: On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:06:46 +0300 Vasily Khoruzhick  wrote: > > В

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-26 Thread Nasa
- "Felix Miata" wrote: > On 2010/09/26 20:09 (GMT) Nasa composed: > > > I should be a little more clear -- to create a modeline for a > resolution > > of 800x400 > > Are all your attempts so lax in typing accuracy? According to > http://www.lilliput.cn/EBY701-NP.html you should be trying f

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-26 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/09/26 20:09 (GMT) Nasa composed: > I should be a little more clear -- to create a modeline for a resolution > of 800x400 Are all your attempts so lax in typing accuracy? According to http://www.lilliput.cn/EBY701-NP.html you should be trying for 800x480. Typos compound your difficulty, es

[Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] i915 regression fixes

2010-09-26 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Linus, a couple of fixes for some recent regressions. The following changes since commit 32163f4b2cef28a5aab8b226ffecfc6379a53786: alpha: fix usp value in multithreaded coredumps (2010-09-25 14:38:13 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-26 Thread Nasa
- "Felix Miata" wrote: > On 2010/09/26 19:21 (GMT) Nasa composed: > > > I'm starting to look at the code and see if I can hardwire support > > for vertical refresh rates greater than 60.0 (haven't figured that > > out yet) > > It's rare for a flat panel display to either need refresh highe

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-26 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/09/26 19:21 (GMT) Nasa composed: > I'm starting to look at the code and see if I can hardwire support > for vertical refresh rates greater than 60.0 (haven't figured that > out yet) It's rare for a flat panel display to either need refresh higher than "60", or product better performance u

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-26 Thread Nasa
- "Felix Miata" wrote: > On 2010/08/26 21:56 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed: > > Future Intel/800x480 Googlers might welcome finding this thread > extended, > preferably to successful conclusion. > -- I wish I could provide a successful completion -- but not so far... I'm starting to loo