Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix black screen bug on Dell e6510

2010-09-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:36:47 +0200, Hette Visser wrote: > This patch fixes the black screen bug on Dell e6510: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29278 > > It adds two delays to give the eDP panel time to turn on before we > continue with the next write. Can you please base your patc

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fwd: [PATCH] CHROMIUM: i915: Added default LVDS options for the no-VBT case

2010-09-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:20:02 -0700, Simon Que wrote: > I've subscribed to the intel-gfx list and am re-sending my email. > Please see below, thanks. It's probably a safe assumption that the vast majority of panels will want to have dithering enabled, so just rearrange the code to set the defaults

[Intel-gfx] Fwd: [PATCH] CHROMIUM: i915: Added default LVDS options for the no-VBT case

2010-09-23 Thread Simon Que
I've subscribed to the intel-gfx list and am re-sending my email. Please see below, thanks. Simon -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:10 PM Subject: [PATCH] CHROMIUM: i915: Added default LVDS options for the no-VBT case To: s...@chromium.org Your messa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix black screen bug on Dell e6510

2010-09-23 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:36:47 +0200 Hette Visser wrote: > This patch fixes the black screen bug on Dell e6510: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29278 > > It adds two delays to give the eDP panel time to turn on before we > continue with the next write. > > > --- drivers/gpu/drm/i9

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix black screen bug on Dell e6510

2010-09-23 Thread Hette Visser
This patch fixes the black screen bug on Dell e6510: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29278 It adds two delays to give the eDP panel time to turn on before we continue with the next write. --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c.orig2010-09-23 20:13:36.046856913 +0200 +++ driver

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] glx: Fix use after free in DrawableGone

2010-09-23 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
2010/9/23 Jeremy Huddleston : > That seems off to me.  This is doing more than changing the c->next > dereference.  You're now freeing it where you weren't before. > > Previously, you freed it inside: > if (c->isCurrent && (c->drawPriv == glxPriv || c->readPriv == glxPriv)) >    if(!c->idExists) >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] glx: Fix use after free in DrawableGone

2010-09-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:04:11 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg Now that is starting to look familiar ;-) Reported-by: Julien Cristau Tested-by: Chris Wilson -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] glx: Fix use after free in DrawableGone

2010-09-23 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg --- Chris Wilson points out that we were still accessing c->next after free. Here's an updated version that fixes that. Kristian glx/glxext.c | 11 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/glx/glxext.c b/glx/glxext.c index e2

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] glx: Fix use after free in DrawableGone

2010-09-23 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg --- > ==2989== Invalid write of size 4 > ==2989==at 0x48CE6E5: DrawableGone (glxext.c:169) > ==2989==by 0x809F401: FreeResource (resource.c:601) > ==2989==by 0x80845CE: ProcDestroyWindow (dispatch.c:733) > ==2989==by 0x8087D76: Dispatch (dispatch.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.901 (2.13 rc1)

2010-09-23 Thread Nasa
- "Carl Worth" wrote: > This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming > 2.13.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from > testing of this snapshot. > > As can be seen below, Chris Wilson in responsible for a huge majority > of > the bug fixes in 2.12.90