[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] agp/intel: Fix cache control for Sandybridge

2010-08-26 Thread Zhenyu Wang
Sandybridge GTT has new cache control bits in PTE, which controls graphics page cache in LLC or LLC/MLC. This one trys to use new type mask function for that. And this sets cache control to always LLC only by default on Gen6. Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang --- drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c|1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] agp/intel: add new intel-gtt.h for new GTT controls

2010-08-26 Thread Zhenyu Wang
New intel gfx device requires new GTT controls. Add them into under kernel include dir to be shared with drm/i915 driver. Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang --- include/linux/intel-gtt.h | 20 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/inte

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] agp/intel: use #ifdef idiom for intel-agp.h

2010-08-26 Thread Zhenyu Wang
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang --- drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.h |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.h b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.h index 08d4753..78124a8 100644 --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.h +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.h @

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-08-26 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/08/26 23:14 (GMT) Nasa composed: > Given Meego's setup where is the appropriate place to put the xrandr > commands? I was confused on this point when I tried that before... I know nothing about Meego other than that you are using it. :-p > X seems to be started from 3 files in /etc/X11

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-08-26 Thread Nasa
- "Felix Miata" wrote: > On 2010/08/26 10:47 (GMT) Nasa composed: > > > I am trying to configure a rather obscure resolution (800x480) which > is the > > native resolution for my monitor. The monitor doesn't provide EDID > or DDC > > information (it's connected over VGA). And the default

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-08-26 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/08/26 10:47 (GMT) Nasa composed: > I am trying to configure a rather obscure resolution (800x480) which is the > native resolution for my monitor. The monitor doesn't provide EDID or DDC > information (it's connected over VGA). And the default settings by the > driver produces displays

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-08-26 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-08-26 18:40- Nasa wrote: - "Alan W. Irwin" wrote: [...]I have assumed above that the horizontal frequency limits have been set correctly for your particular monitor. That is not always the case. Check your monitor manual for the correct vertical and horizontal frequency limi

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-08-26 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-08-26 17:37- Nasa wrote: - "Alan W. Irwin" wrote: On 2010-08-26 10:47- Nasa wrote: Hi, I am trying to configure a rather obscure resolution (800x480) which is the native resolution for my monitor. The monitor doesn't provide EDID or DDC information (it's connecte

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-08-26 Thread Nasa
- "Alan W. Irwin" wrote: > On 2010-08-26 10:47- Nasa wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am trying to configure a rather obscure resolution (800x480) which > is the > > native resolution for my monitor. The monitor doesn't provide EDID > or DDC > > information (it's connected over VGA). An

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Reintegrate legacy UMS.

2010-08-26 Thread Chris Wilson
You probably heard the screams of terror at the prospect of adding 50k lines of broken code. The result of that shock was that it did produce a viable alternative: use a shadow fb and avoid dynamic reallocation and associated incoherency issues. The benefits of this approach is that we get KMS (ho

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-08-26 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-08-26 10:47- Nasa wrote: Hi, I am trying to configure a rather obscure resolution (800x480) which is the native resolution for my monitor. The monitor doesn't provide EDID or DDC information (it's connected over VGA). And the default settings by the driver produces displays that

[Intel-gfx] Installation of Intel drivers in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-08-26 Thread Ganesh Waghmode
Hi, I am trying to install intel drivers in my. My System configuration is as follows: Motherboard : Intel's Mobile 945GME Express Integrated Graphics Controller Operating System : Ubuntu 10.04 X-Server 1.7.6 Kernel : 2.6.32-21-generic I have installed libdrm-2.4.17 successfully. But

[Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-08-26 Thread Nasa
Hi, I am trying to configure a rather obscure resolution (800x480) which is the native resolution for my monitor. The monitor doesn't provide EDID or DDC information (it's connected over VGA). And the default settings by the driver produces displays that don't fit the monitor properly. I wou

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: intel_overlay_print_error_state() only needed for debugfs (v2)

2010-08-26 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:52:16 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > The function intel_overlay_print_error_state() is called from within > i915_error_state() in i915_debufs.c which is only built if > CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is set. When building without this option, seq_printf() > is not declared in intel_overl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: intel_overlay_print_error_state() only needed for debugfs (v2)

2010-08-26 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2010, um 08:41:13 schrieb Andre Müller: > On 08/26/10 01:52, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > > The function intel_overlay_print_error_state() is called from within > > i915_error_state() in i915_debufs.c which is only built if > > CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is set. When building withou

Re: [Intel-gfx] 945 with SR doesn't need manual enable/disable

2010-08-26 Thread Li Peng
Hello, Alexander: I have met system hang issue when directly enable SR on 945, so I enable/disable SR depends on h/w idle status. If you don't see hang anymore. Then it should be fixed in other commits (probably as you said, 944001201ca0196bcdb088129e5866a9f379d08c) Please fix the patch format in

Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)

2010-08-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:30:39 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: [...] > Xorg log is attached. It wasn't. Not it is attached. Regards, Tino Xorg.0.log.gz Description: Binary data ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.free

[Intel-gfx] 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)

2010-08-26 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi, booting 2.6.36-rc2-git4 (commit d4348c678977c7093438bbbf2067c49396ae941b) results in a screen resolution of 1024x768 instead of 1680x1050. It works fine with 2.6.35.2. The framebuffer console uses the correct resolution, but only uses a part of the screen for text output. Xorg output looks d