On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:04:50 +0100, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:45:38 -0700, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > Is this hack even needed? I noticed on my 945GM that INSTDONE has a
> > stuck bit when I use this code, removing it didn't seem to have any
> > negative effects...
>
> I'm no
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:08:59 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 09:39 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:09:32 +0200 Paul Neumann wrote:
> > > i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: can't assign [??? 0x flags 0x0] (bogus
> > > alignment)
> > > [drm] failed to find VB
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 09:39 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:09:32 +0200 Paul Neumann wrote:
> > i915 :00:02.0: BAR 6: can't assign [??? 0x flags 0x0] (bogus
> > alignment)
> > [drm] failed to find VBIOS tables
> > [drm] initialized overlay support
> > No connectors
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:20:34 +0200
Alexey Fisher wrote:
> On Mo, 2010-08-09 at 09:36 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:46:19 +0200
> > Alexey Fisher wrote:
> >
> > > Hallo all,
> > >
> > > i have some times on my primer desktop with Intel DG45ID board some sort
> > > of fli
On Mo, 2010-08-09 at 09:36 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:46:19 +0200
> Alexey Fisher wrote:
>
> > Hallo all,
> >
> > i have some times on my primer desktop with Intel DG45ID board some sort
> > of flickering, it schort (1 second) and only half of the display. Same
> > sort
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:45:38 -0700, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> Is this hack even needed? I noticed on my 945GM that INSTDONE has a
> stuck bit when I use this code, removing it didn't seem to have any
> negative effects...
I'm not sure why we need to trigger a Sync on the GPU at this point, I
just as
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 19:39:40 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> From: Zhenyu Wang
>
> The sync flush enable mask on 845G and 830M is flipped.
> So driver should invert it usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 10 --
>
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:09:32 +0200
Paul Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I use kernel 2.6.35 my screen (connected via DVI) is not turned on.
> Everything else works fine so I can ssh into the machine and safely shut it
> down. This did not happen with 2.6.34. However I know that the issue is
> ca
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:46:19 +0200
Alexey Fisher wrote:
> Hallo all,
>
> i have some times on my primer desktop with Intel DG45ID board some sort
> of flickering, it schort (1 second) and only half of the display. Same
> sort of flickering i had with Bug 24314 - [945GME FBC] underruns
> followed
Adam Hill reported that his Arrandale system required a much longer, up
to 200x500us, wait for the panel to initialise or else modesetting would
fail.
References:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29141
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Reported-by: Adam Hill
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 11:13 +0200, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> Seems like totem (video player) re ask every time for new hardware or
> some thing like this. i can't reproduce it with mplayer.
> My question is, is it the right way to do? are they any thing wrong
> about it?
They shouldn't be reprobing
wait_for() uses msleep() to yield the cpu whilst spinning waiting for a
register to change. kdb asserts that mode changes are atomic and so
prohibits msleep. The alternative would be to use mdelay or to simply
probe the register more often instead of busy waiting.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
If we don't flush the write then we can not be sure that the border
colour will have taken effect by the time we try to read it back.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/int
It takes over 0.5s to probe the outputs and configure the i915 console.
This can be performed in the background whilst the rest of the system
is booting.
Based on a patch by Arjan van de Van
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c |6 ++
drivers
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 22:57:33 +0100, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:21:59 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > With the drm fix to not re-dpms the crtc, is this one still needed?
>
> No. I had to disable both this and Dave Airlie's double dpms defense, but
> with the drm crtc dpms fix thi
15 matches
Mail list logo