Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7 resend] drm/i915: Add the support of eDP on DP-D for Ibex/CPT

2010-06-16 Thread ykzhao
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 22:28 +0800, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 09:28 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:32:21 +0800, Zhenyu Wang > > wrote: > > > static void > > > -intel_dp_compute_m_n(int bytes_per_pixel, > > > +intel_dp_compute_m_n(int bpp, > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday June 16 2010 15:57:41 Chris Wilson wrote: > One more step. Test that commit and tell git bisect (good|bad) and it will > print a slightly more verbose statement of which commit is triggering the > freeze. Sometimes I amaze myself :S It clearly says *after* this. I'll do that tonight

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Marc Deop i Argemí > wrote: >> On Wednesday June 16 2010 11:20:09 Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> Freeze is... freeze :P >> >> Now, seriously, the computer stops responding. I'm not able to switch between >> V

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7 resend] drm/i915: Add the support of eDP on DP-D for Ibex/CPT

2010-06-16 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2010.06.14 18:19:46 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:32:21 +0800, Zhenyu Wang > wrote: > > From: Zhao Yakui > > > > This one adds support for eDP that connected on PCH DP-D port > > instead of CPU DP-A port, and only DP-D port could be used for eDP. > > > > https://bugs.fr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7 resend] drm/i915: Add the support of eDP on DP-D for Ibex/CPT

2010-06-16 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2010.06.14 10:28:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 09:28 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:32:21 +0800, Zhenyu Wang > > wrote: > > > static void > > > -intel_dp_compute_m_n(int bytes_per_pixel, > > > +intel_dp_compute_m_n(int bpp, > > >i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:10:35 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Wednesday June 16 2010 10:45:34 Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > Anyway, I will try to bisect today and report back :) > > Well, I tried. Does this message: > > Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday June 16 2010 10:45:34 Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > Anyway, I will try to bisect today and report back :) Well, I tried. Does this message: Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) [29ba8a84f7cf5c29a5f38688a1ac0ccf41d8e4ec] XvMC: everyone's using execbuffer!

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Wednesday June 16 2010 11:20:09 Chris Wilson wrote: >> After a freeze, can you grab a copy of dmesg, Xorg.log, intel_reg_dump, >> and /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_error_state. From my perspective, the >> last contains the most interes

[Intel-gfx] [2.6.35 regression ping] i915 is unusable due to CRT hotplug bug

2010-06-16 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
Hi all- Just a friendly regression reminder: a recent patch intended to fix the long-standing hotplug storm bugs in i915 instead made it a good deal worse -- I now get hotplug interrupts constantly as long as anything (plymouth or Xorg, for example) is querying CRT status. Analysis and potential

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday June 16 2010 11:20:09 Chris Wilson wrote: > After a freeze, can you grab a copy of dmesg, Xorg.log, intel_reg_dump, > and /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_error_state. From my perspective, the > last contains the most interesting information (the batchbuffer executing > at the time of a gp

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:05:15 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Tuesday June 15 2010 02:39:54 Carl Worth wrote: > > This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming > > 2.12.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from > > testing of this snapshot to improve t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Tuesday June 15 2010 23:23:42 Carl Worth wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:12:28 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > That looks like a lot of work, ain't it? :S > > It shouldn't be, once you get the hang of compiling and running against > a locally-compiled driver. There are about 176 commits