On 2010.05.03 11:41:33 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:42:37 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > Since it's only in -next right now, do you have plans to look into why
> > this went wrong? I'm concerned that we're reverting a bugfix to
> > "revisit later" with no plan to actually revi
Sandybridge(Gen6) has new format for PIPE_CONTROL command,
the flush and post-op control are in dword 1 now. This
changes command length field for difference between Ironlake
and Sandybridge.
I tried to test this with noop request and issue PIPE_CONTROL
command for each sequence and track notify i
Hi,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
To clarify,
This patch is used for H.264/VC1 decoding.
Abstract ring buffer is also needed for our later generation GPUs,
Because there are more types of ring buffer to come.
H.264/VC1 HW decoding is a bigger requirement than mepg2.
XvMC VLD can only support
DisplayPort spec v1.1a, Table 2-52.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 77e40cf..78a75e8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 78a75e8..a1a6785 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i91
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 10:46 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2010.05.12 11:29:53 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > eDP panels are often fixed-rate. Grab the link speed and lane count
> > from the VBT and use those instead of trying to compute them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
> > ---
>
> Loo
ajax, thanks a lot for working on this!
I've tried the patch but it doesn't fix my issue (I've updated the bug with
dmesg output).
Kind regards,
Dick
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listi
Hi Eric,
I've managed to reproduce the problems due to my delayed tiling patch on my
i945. Unfortunately I haven't yet tracked it down - seems to be there's a
rather big misconception in my brain. Anyway here's the second patch of my
shrink-gem_bo series rebased against current drm-intel-next.
P
This saves a whooping 7 dwords. Zero functional changes. Because
some of the refcounts are rather tightly calculated, I've put
BUG_ONs in the code to check for overflows.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 75 +-
drivers/gpu/d
If the object is bigger than the entire aperture, reject it early
before evicting everything in a vain attempt to find space.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/driv
10 matches
Mail list logo