Though I would like to cheer for Kireeti's 2. as well I think the point of
SHOULD is more realistic (for now) as Joel points out ...
As to ethertype, I think grown-ups in the room were since long time drily
observing that a new IP version would have been appropriate after enough
contortions-of-it'
obile nodes
>>> which move from network to network.
>>> >
>>> > Is this closed domain - no by any means. Is it working today - yes
>>> pretty well.
>>> >
>>> > So proposing a new ethertype for SRv6 today seems to be comparable to
&g
1:05 PM
> > *To:* Krzysztof Szarkowicz ;
> Kireeti Kompella
> > *Cc:* Adrian Farrel ; Andrew Alston - IETF
> ; int-area@ietf.org;
> spr...@ietf.org; Dr. Tony Przygienda
> > *Subject:* RE: [spring] [Int-area] FW: New Version Notification for
> draft-raviolli-intarea-tru
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 10:29 PM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> On 02-Apr-23 05:53, Tony Przygienda wrote:
> > ?
> >
> > I heard the argument that IPv6 address space is large and "easy to carve
> up to mean other things&
