Re: [Int-area] INT ADs' Office Hours

On 25 Oct 2013, at 20:31, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: >> If you ask nicely, Ted will recite poetry. :) > > Vogon poetry... Gosh, what if you don't ask nicely? :) Tim ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.

Re: [Int-area] IP broadcast and multicast protocol considerations

Hi, > On 26 Jan 2016, at 01:01, Christian Huitema wrote: > > On Monday, January 25, 2016 4:37 PM, Rolf Winter wrote: >> >> Am 1/26/16 um 1:10 AM schrieb Christian Huitema: >> ... >>> >>> Rolf, I appreciate that you are trying to improve network privacy, but I >> wonder whether a generic abstra

Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Discovering Provisioning Domain Names and Data

Hi, I also support this work, building on the foundations of RFC7556. Tim > On 4 Sep 2017, at 09:22, Marcus Keane wrote: > > I agree. Personally, I think it could be particularly useful for larger > enterprises. > Marcus > > From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted

Re: [Int-area] IPv10.

On 12 Sep 2017, at 18:39, Khaled Omar wrote: > > So in your opinion, what should happen now? Updating the I-D only? Or we > should go forward? Or the IPv10 draft is not interesting at all? I believe you can request an IETF mail list, e.g. ip...@ietf.org to discuss your

Re: [Int-area] Comments on current MPvD draft.

> On 15 Nov 2017, at 11:00, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Ted Lemon wrote: > >> The assumption that each PvD will have its own router > > I don't think this is the case? It's just that each PVD is in its own RA, it > doesn't mean one router can't send multiple RAs, one per

[Int-area] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-01

Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Has Issues This is an early review of draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-01. Overall: the draft is generally in good shape; with some relatively minor revisions to address some issues it should be approaching ready for last call soon. In my comments below

Re: [Int-area] Stateless devices and IP fragmentation

Hi, > On 21 Nov 2018, at 13:40, Ron Bonica wrote: > > Brian, > > Fair enough. I have worked the 1280 byte requirement into Section 7.4. New > text is included below. > > Ron > > 7.4. For Network Operators > > As per RFC 4890, network

Re: [Int-area] [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-09

ing-domains-10) that addresses your comments. On Dec 26, 2019, at 2:26 AM, Tim Chown via Datatracker mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote: Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Has Nits Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review al

[Int-area] Jumbo frame side meeting at IETF118 - notes

-area list to gauge interest, rather than set up a new list at this stage. So, all thoughts and comments welcome... -- Jumbo frame side meeting, IETF118, 2-3pm Thu 9 November Convened by Tim Chown (Jisc) and Gorry Fairhurst (Univ Aberdeen) The meeting had no set agenda. The aim was to gather

[Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)

Hi, From: Paul Vixie Date: Tuesday, 24 September 2024 at 20:59 To: Templin (US), Fred L , Internet Area , IPv6 List Subject: [Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs) Something like this is long needed and will become badly needed. Every 10X of speed increase since 10mbit/sec has gon

[Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)

Hi Fred, From: Templin (US), Fred L Date: Thursday, 26 September 2024 at 18:52 To: Tim Chown , Paul Vixie , Internet Area , IPv6 List Subject: RE: [Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs) Hi Tim, presumably the motivation for the use of 9000 MTUs in the CERN experiments is that

[Int-area] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-10

Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Ready with Nits Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Ready with Nits This is a INT-DIR review of draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-10, which was updated from the -09 version on 14th May. Overall: This is a well-written draft, explaining both the weaknesses of

[Int-area] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-09

Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Has Nits Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF d