Alexander Vainshtein wrote on 28/03/2024 15:03:
Alvaro and all,
Regarding the proposal for using a dedicated Ethertype for SRv6:
Please note that RFC explicitly “introduces two data-plane
instantiations of SR: SR over MPLS (SR-MPLS) and SR over IPv6 (SRv6)”
and defines SRv6 as the instantiati
Tobias Fiebig wrote on 07/04/2025 23:17:
This occurs, for example, if you have an RFC8950 session to a route-
server at an IX and the route-server also sends you v4 routes with a
_v4_ nexthop.
At the risk of raining on some parades, rfc8950 at internet exchanges is
experimental so far. The lon
Tobias Fiebig wrote on 08/04/2025 14:04:
...is kind of useful here, because it also gives an IX an easy way to
do proxy "ARP" for those v4 members, without actually sending ARP that
would be misunderstood by them.
Now I've seen "IX" and "proxy arp" in the same sentence.
As a proposal.
Can we
