[Int-area] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: CASM (Centralized Address Space Management)

2017-01-19 Thread Marc Blanchet
FYI. Marc. (sorry for duplicates)--- Begin Message --- A new IETF non-working group email list has been created. List address: c...@ietf.org To subscribe: https://ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/casm Purpose: The mailing list will support discussion of such an interface and requirements for support va

Re: [Int-area] [Tvr] Side meeting for Satellite networking in IETF 116

2023-03-13 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 13 mars 2023 à 04:29, Lin Han a écrit : > > Hi, > > The side meeting for satellite networking is reserved on Mar. 28, Tuesday, > from 11:00AM to 12:30PM, in the room G301. See > https://wiki.ietf.org/meeting/116/sidemeetings It is unfortunate that this interesting side meeting have an

[Int-area] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd

2023-07-25 Thread Marc Blanchet
Hello, Saw your presentation yesterday at masque and now read your draft. Fine by the overall approach, but I was wondering if you have considered to use DNS-SD (aka Bonjour)? I could see a proxy on the local network advertising its proxy service and the client « finding » the proxy by the DNS-

Re: [Int-area] [Masque] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd

2023-07-26 Thread Marc Blanchet
tion. Helps understand better understand the use case. Still I think dns-sd could be an additional mechanism (but for typical networks (e.g. non cell), especially since dns-sd would be very straightforward and would not need provisioning infrastructure change. Thanks for the response. Marc

Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Inbound and outbound connections

2008-08-13 Thread Marc Blanchet
Spencer Dawkins a écrit : Agreeing with Iljitch's math here, but ... In case people aren't already aware of it, I think the work at the second URL below is very interesting in discussing the possible implications of CGN, and in particular the number of outbound and inbound ports needed per acti

Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Inbound and outbound connections

2008-08-13 Thread Marc Blanchet
Ted Lemon a écrit : On Aug 13, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Dan Wing wrote: Gotcha: So you're saying "if you're behind a CGN (doing v4v4 NAT or v6v4 NAT), you get 100 ports. But if you are doing native v6, you get 64K ports. Your massive port-consuming p2p application will work better with 64K ports".

Re: [Int-area] ISP Shared Address QA

2008-12-02 Thread Marc Blanchet
Dave Thaler a écrit : >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Akira Nakagawa >> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 6:45 PM >> To: int-area@ietf.org >> Subject: [Int-area] ISP Shared Address QA >> >> >> All, >> >> This is Akira Nakagawa, Tokyo.

[Int-area] announcing DNS64-NAT64 opensource implementations

2010-02-08 Thread Marc Blanchet
ttp://ecdysis.viagenie.ca Regards, Marc Blanchet, Simon Perreault, Jean-Philippe Dionne Viagenie ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Re: [Int-area] Announcing fmc mailing list

2012-04-04 Thread Marc Blanchet
Hi, the description of the mailing list says: " serving access to multi-interface terminals". Looks like MIF to me. - how is this different from MIF? - why did the MIF ML was not part of the "multicast"? Marc. Le 2012-04-04 à 11:36, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit : > A new list has been created for