[Int-area] Call for agenda items @ IETF 95

Hi all, We have requested a slot for the IntArea WG at IETF 95 in Buenos Aires. Please send along requests for agenda time, and remember that we will give priority to WG drafts and drafts that have already received significant discussion. Cheers, Juan Carlos, Suresh & Wassim

[Int-area] IETF95 minutes

Hi all, The draft minutes from the BsAs meeting are available: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-intarea Please let us know if you have any comments or additions. We thank Ian Farrer for taking notes during the meeting. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim

[Int-area] WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-02

at applies to draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) Best, Juan Carlos Zuniga & Wassim Haddad (Int-Area WG co-chairs)__

[Int-area] WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-adhoc-wireless-com-01

s-com? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) Best, Juan Carlos Zuniga & Wassim Haddad (Int-Area WG co-chairs)___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https:

[Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-03

Dear IntArea WG, As explained in Suresh's email, there is an intention to move draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-03 to the IntArea WG due to its applicability. Hence, Wassim and I as IntArea WG chairs are starting a working group adoption call until July 6th. If you consider that the draft should be adopted as

[Int-area] IETF96 Minutes

*https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-intarea * We thank Ian Farrer for taking notes during the meeting. Safe travels back home to all! Juan Carlos & Wassim ___ Int-are

[Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

Dear all, At the Berlin meeting we got strong support to adopt draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02 as a WG work item. We are now confirming the adoption by issuing this call on the ML. The document has been presented and discussed now for a few meetings and we believe the contents are high

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

meeting. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Juan Carlos Zuniga wrote: > Dear all, > > At the Berlin meeting we got strong support to adopt > draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02 > as a WG work item. We are now confirming the adoption by issuing th

[Int-area] IETF97 Minutes

Here they are: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-97-intarea/ Thanks to Ian Farrer (and other Etherpad scribes) for taking notes during the meeting. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mail

Re: [Int-area] IETF97 Minutes

you gave after the meeting is not acceptable.* > > > > *Regards,* > > *Lucy* > > > > *From:* Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Juan > Carlos Zuniga > *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 3:22 PM > *To:* int-area@ietf.org >

Re: [Int-area] IETF97 Minutes

will get a time in next > meeting if it is like this time. Allocating many 5min talks in a meeting > means no question at all. Is it the WG meeting intend?* > > > > *Regards,* > > *Lucy* > > > > *From:* Juan Carlos Zuniga [mailto:j.c.zun...@ieee.org] > *Sent:*

[Int-area] WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider

y IPR that applies to draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) Best, Juan Carlos Zuniga & Wassim Haddad (Int-Area WG co-chairs) __

Re: [Int-area] [www.ietf.org/rt #163372] Liaison from IEEE 802.1 WG to IETF IntArea WG

ent: March 22, 2017 8:10 PM > To: Juan Carlos Zuniga ; int-area@ietf.org; > intarea-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Int-area] [www.ietf.org/rt #163372] Liaison from IEEE 802.1 WG > to IETF IntArea WG > > On 03/22/2017 02:30 PM, Juan Carlos Zuniga wrote: > > Dear IntArea W

[Int-area] IntArea agenda and slides

Presenters, Please send your slides by Monday at 15:00 hrs (CDT). We will be meeting at: 13:00-14:30Tuesday Afternoon session I, Room Zurich D The agenda is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda/intarea Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim

[Int-area] IETF 98 Minutes

Hello, The minutes of the IntArea meeting at IETF 98 in Chicago are here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-98-intarea/ Thanks again to Ian Farrer for taking notes during the meeting. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim ___ Int-area mailing list Int-ar

Re: [Int-area] Decisions regarding IPv10 I-D.

Hello all, As explained to Khaled, since there is no rough consensus and based on the technical feedback, we will not be progressing the draft. Thanks to Christian, Lee, Mikael, and others for their technical reviews and procedural advice given to the author. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim (IntArea

Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-06.txt

Thanks for the feedback. Joe, Mark: Please proceed with the required changes in the document (Section 5, etc.) to move it to BCP. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black, David Sent: May 22, 2017 11:56 AM To: Joe Touch ; int-area@ietf.org

[Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)

Dear all, The IntArea mailing list has been repeatedly used to debate draft-omar-ipv10. So far, comments posted on the mailing list have consistently pointed towards a highly controversial topic on multiple levels. This includes the lack of a valid problem statement as well as a clear and persi

Re: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)

from the IntArea mailing list. Best regards, Juan Carlos, Wassim & Suresh IntArea WG Chairs + AD From: Juan Carlos Zuniga Sent: October 4, 2017 11:08 PM To: int-area@ietf.org Cc: 'Wassim Haddad' ; Suresh Krishnan ; intarea-chairs Subject: Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)

Re: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)

Hello, Indeed, the IntArea group has decided not to further discuss this draft. Regards, Juan Carlos From: Khaled Omar [mailto:eng.khaled.o...@hotmail.com] Sent: November 3, 2017 9:17 AM To: Juan Carlos Zuniga Cc: int-area Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10) Hi

[Int-area] WGLC on draft-ietf-intarea-gue-05 & draft-ietf-intarea-gue-extensions-03

, and 5378 for more details.) Best, Juan Carlos Zuniga & Wassim Haddad (Int-Area WG co-chairs) ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

[Int-area] Minutes IntArea IETF 101 London

Hi all, Thanks to Ian Farrer for taking up the minutes for the IntArea session. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-101-intarea/ Let us know if there is any comment/amendment. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org

[Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

Dear all, After some discussions on the v6ops and intarea mailing lists, the author of draft-daveor-cgn-logging is requesting its adoption by the IntArea WG. Hence, we would like to start a WG adoption call for draft-daveor-cgn-logging-04 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-daveor-cgn-loggin

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

O'Reilly Cc: Stephen Farrell ; Juan Carlos Zuniga ; wassim.had...@ericsson.com Subject: Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies On May 1, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Dave O'Reilly mailto:r...@

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

/make-historical 6302? Although this is something that may need to be addressed beyond the IntArea WG, any inputs people can provide here would be useful. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juan Carlos Zuniga Sent: April 19, 2018 5:38 PM To:

[Int-area] Minutes IntArea IETF 103 Bangkok

Hi all, Thanks to Ian Farrer for taking the minutes for the IntArea session. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/minutes-103-intarea-00 Let us know if there are any comments/amendments. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim ___ Int-area mailing l

Re: [Int-area] Agenda bash request - GUE timing

Hi David, No worries. We will change the agenda accordingly. Best Juan Carlos > On Mar 24, 2019, at 16:50, Black, David wrote: > > I have a conflict with the first half of the intarea meeting in Prague on > Thursday – as the TSV-ART reviewer of the GUE draft, it would be very helpful > if the

[Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 105

Hi all, The minutes have been uploaded - thanks a lot to Tommy and Mirja for taking notes! Please take a look and let us know is there are any corrections/clarifications needed. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/minutes-105-intarea-00 Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim

Re: [Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 105

Thanks for the correction Dan! Updated minutes are here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/minutes-105-intarea-01 Jc From: Dan Romascanu Sent: July 23, 2019 10:17 PM To: Juan Carlos Zuniga Cc: int-area Subject: Re: [Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 105 Hi, Thanks for the

Re: [Int-area] Call for Agenda Items @IETF107

myself. Best, Juan-Carlos & Wassim From: Wassim Haddad Sent: February 26, 2020 4:59 PM To: int-area@ietf.org Cc: Wassim Haddad ; Juan Carlos Zuniga ; intarea-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Call for Agenda Items @IETF107 Dear all, In preparation for the Intarea WG meeting (Thursday, March

Re: [Int-area] Int Area Interim Meeting?

Hi Bob, No, we have decided to cancel IntArea WG for IETF107. We will be sending details about the next meeting once we know more details about IETF108. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim From: Bob Hinden Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 11:38 To: Wassim Haddad Cc: Bo

Re: [Int-area] Int Area Interim Meeting?

does one have to support that supposition? [JCZ] I would consider that discussion out-of-scope for this list. Best, Juan Carlos > > Alex, LF/HF 1 > > Le 02/04/2020 à 17:44, Juan Carlos Zuniga a écrit : > > Hi Bob, > > > > No, we have decided to cancel IntAre

[Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 108

Hi all, The minutes have been uploaded - thanks a lot to Pascal for helping with the notes! Please take a look and let us know is there are any corrections/clarifications needed: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-108-intarea/ Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim __

[Int-area] Call for WG adoption of draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6

Dear IntArea WG, Now with the summer almost over and following the strong support shown at the IETF 108 meeting, we are starting a 2-week call for adoption of the SOCKS v6 draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6-09 The document has been discussed for quite some time alr

Re: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

tions. Running code with proven results would also help. Once you get positive support on the mailing list, we will gladly consider it for presentation at the meeting. Best regards, Juan Carlos Zuniga & Wassim Haddad (Internet Area WG Chairs) ___ In

Re: [Int-area] [Captive-portals] [homenet] [EXTERNAL] Re: Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications

Indeed, this is a continuation of the work started at IEEE 802 back in 2014 after the STRINT Workshop pre-IETF 89 [1] [2]. So far IEEE 802 has developed the (soon to be published) 802E Privacy Recommendations [3], the recommended use of MAC address randomization in 802c [4], and now the work in

[Int-area] BoF and Non-WG Mailing List: madinas -- MAC Address Device Identification for Network and Application Services

Hello all, At IETF109 there will be a BoF to discuss MAC address randomization and implications on network and application services. If you are interested in the topic please join the mailing list. A draft agenda of the BoF can be found here: https://github.com/jlivingood/IETF109BoF/blob/master/

[Int-area] Call for SAAG comments on draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6

Hello, IntArea WG is planning to adopt draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6, and a circulation with SAAG was suggested at IETF 109. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6-11 The document has been discussed for quite some time already at IntArea, it has evolved significantly, and it h

[Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 109

Hi all, The minutes of the meeting have been uploaded – thanks a lot to those helping with the notes! Please take a look and let us know if there are any corrections/clarifications needed: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/minutes-109-intarea-01 Best, Juan Carlos & W

Re: [Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 109

Thanks to David Schinazi for the clarification on the minutes about the MASQUE scope discussion. The new version is now: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/minutes-109-intarea-02 Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:00 PM Juan Carlos Zuniga wrote: >

Re: [Int-area] Dear intarea chairs: int-area time planning

Hi Toerless, Your point is taken. We have had multiple issues trying to accommodate late requests (arriving after we have already requested the time slot to the IETF meeting planners). However, we will try to avoid this trend and will request a longer slot for the next time. Likewise, it wou

[Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 110

Hi all, The minutes of the meeting have been uploaded – thanks a lot to Pascal and Shuping for helping with the notes! We recorded the following two requests: * Request a longer slot for the next meeting * For that we also would ask presenters to respond on time to the call to pres

[Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 112

Hi all, The minutes of the meeting have been uploaded – thanks a lot to Luigi for helping with the notes! https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-112-intarea/ As usual, any comments/corrections on the minutes are welcome. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim __

[Int-area] Note taker / jabber scribe for IntArea session @ IETF 113

Hi, As usual, we will need a few people to help us with the notes and jabber to run the meeting. Please send us a note if you can help us out. Best, Juan-Carlos & Wassim ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinf

[Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 113

Hi all, The minutes of the meeting have been uploaded. A special note to thank Laurent and Ivan for helping with the notes! https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-113-intarea/ As usual, any comments/corrections on the minutes are welcome. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim

Re: [Int-area] IntArea WG Minutes IETF 113

Hi Fred, Thanks for the review. The minutes have been corrected accordingly. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/minutes-113-intarea-04 Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim From: Templin (US), Fred L Date: Friday, April 1, 2022 at 11:19 AM To: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) , int-

[Int-area] Next steps for draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis

Hi Luigi, Yihao, et al. Under the context of your request for a call for adoption for draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis-02, after discussing with our AD (Éric), we would like to know: * Is the purpose of the draft to have a one shot informational/academic publication? *

[Int-area] Call for WG adoption of draft-templin-intarea-parcels-10

Dear IntArea WG, We are starting a 2-week call for adoption of the IP-Parcels draft: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-templin-intarea-parcels-10.html The document has been discussed for some time and it has received multiple comments. If you have an opinion on whether this document should

Re: [Int-area] Next steps for draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis

& W From: Luigi Iannone Date: Friday, July 1, 2022 at 8:03 AM To: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) , Wassim Haddad , Eric Vyncke (evyncke) , int-area Subject: Re: Next steps for draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis Hi Juan-Carlos, Wassim, Thanks for your email. The purpos

Re: [Int-area] Call for WG adoption of draft-templin-intarea-parcels-10

Hi all, As mentioned during the meeting, we will close the call at the end of the IETF 114 week. If you have any last comments, please speak up. Best, Juan Carlos & Wassim From: Int-area on behalf of Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 2:26 PM To: int-

[Int-area] Call for Adoption - IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol and Documentation Usage for IEEE 802 Parameters draft

Dear IntArea WG, We are starting a 2-week call for adoption of IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol and Documentation Usage for IEEE 802 Parameters draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-eastlake-rfc7042bis-09 If you have an opinion on whether this document should be adopted by the

Re: [Int-area] New Liaison Statement, "Liaison on P802.1CQ Multicast and Local Address Assignment"

Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) , Wassim Haddad Cc: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) , Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) , Eric Gray , Erik Kline , Glenn Parsons , Internet Area Working Group Discussion List , John Messenger , Paul Nikolich , Wassim Haddad , liaison-coordinat...@iab.org Subject: New Lia

Re: [Int-area] Call for Adoption - IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol and Documentation Usage for IEEE 802 Parameters draft

Dear all, This email concludes the adoption call. Since there is clear WG support, we would like to request the authors to produce a new draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis-00. Best, Juan-Carlos & Wassim (IntArea WG chairs) From: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) Date: Wednesday, August 31, 202

[Int-area] Next steps for draft-ietf-intarea-schc-ip-protocol-number-00

Hi IntArea WG, Today we had an interesting discussion about the future of draft-ietf-intarea-schc-ip-protocol-number-00. We would like to ask Bob Moskowitz et al. to upload a revised I-D with the text about the EtherType and UDP port numbers. Once we have that draft published, we will re-confir

[Int-area] IETF 115 IntArea minutes

Hi all, Thanks a lot to Luigi Ioannone for helping with the notes! The minutes are now posted. Please take a look and let us know if you have any comments: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-115-intarea/ Best, Juan-Carlos & Wassim (IntArea WG chairs)

[Int-area] IETF 118 IntArea minutes

Hi all, Thanks a lot to Stuart Cheshire for helping with the notes! The minutes are now posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-118-intarea-202311091400/ Best, Juan-Carlos & Wassim (IntArea WG chairs) ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.

Re: [Int-area] IETF 118 IntArea minutes

Thanks for the notes Fred. The minutes have been amended accordingly. Best, Jc & W From: Templin (US), Fred L Date: Monday, November 13, 2023 at 17:00 To: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) , int-area@ietf.org Subject: RE: IETF 118 IntArea minutes Hi, thank you for this but the minutes that t

[Int-area] Call for WG adoption of draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-02

Dear IntArea WG, As agreed at the IETF 119 meeting, we are starting a 2-week call for adoption of the Communicating Proxy Configurations in Provisioning Domains draft: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-02.html The document has been discussed for some time and i

[Int-area] Re: Call for WG adoption of draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-02

Dear all, This message concludes the adoption call. Since there's clear WG support, we would like to request the authors to submit a new draft: draft-ietf-intarea-proxy-config-00 Regards, Juan Carlos & Wassim (IntArea WG chairs) From: Int-area on behalf of Juan Carlos Zuniga

[Int-area] Call for WG adoption of draft-fenner-intarea-probe-clarification

Dear IntArea WG, As discussed at the IETF 121 meeting, we are starting a 2-week WG call for adoption of PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-fenner-intarea-probe-clarification-02.html The document has been discussed for some time and it has seen good sup

[Int-area] Re: Call for WG adoption of draft-fenner-intarea-probe-clarification

Hello, Thanks for the feedback. This email concludes the call for adoption. Authors: please submit a revision of the latest draft. Regards, Juan-Carlos & Wassim From: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2024 at 05:56 To: int-area@ietf.org Subject: [Int-area] Call

[Int-area] Call for WG adoption of draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6

Dear IntArea WG, Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6/ was presented at IETF 122 and we heard strong interest from the WG. Hence, we would like to confirm the adoption by holding a 2-week WG call for adoption. If you have an opinion on whether this document

[Int-area] Re: Requesting adoption: draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6 - "IPv4 routes with an IPv6 next hop" 

Authors, sorry about the delay, and thanks for the thorough follow up. The ball is now rolling. Best, Jc From: David 'equinox' Lamparter Date: Monday, May 12, 2025 at 15:10 To: intarea-chairs Cc: Warren Kumari , Internet Area , draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Int-a

[Int-area] Re: Call for WG adoption of draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6

Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) Date: Monday, May 12, 2025 at 10:19 To: Internet Area Cc: Wassim Haddad Subject: Call for WG adoption of draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6 Dear IntArea WG, Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6/ was presented at IETF 122 and we h

[Int-area] WGLC for "PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces" draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis

Dear IntArea WG, The authors of Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis/ are requesting a WGLC. The latest draft was presented at IETF 122 and over time we have seen some interest from the WG. Hence, we are starting now a 2-week WG Last Call. Please express