ted auth methods an option, an treating it as "I only
support
no auth" when it's not there
- Out of curiosity, what specific use case are you using this protocol for?
Thanks,
David Schinazi
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 05:08, Vladimir Olteanu
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
Hi Vlad,
Responses inline.
> On Jun 30, 2017, at 06:56, Vladimir Olteanu
> wrote:
>
> Hey David,
>
> Thanks for the kind words. I'll address your questions inline:
> On 6/29/2017 9:09 PM, David Schinazi wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> Thanks fo
roducing an extra
level of indirection or IP headers, I don't think tunnels are the solution to
all woes.
[1] http://www.stuartcheshire.org/rants/latency.html
<http://www.stuartcheshire.org/rants/latency.html>
Thanks,
David Schinazi
> On Jul 25, 2017, at 08:59, Gabor Lencse
OCKS options without mentioning sockets (which are an
implementation detail) would address my concerns.
Thanks,
David Schinazi
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 16:03, Vladimir Olteanu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We've submitted a revision of the SOCKSv6 draft.
>
> We've added an ext
I think this draft is a good idea and I'd like to see it progress. Doing
this in Babel worked quite well, and I agree that it makes sense to
generalize it.
On the topic of source addresses for ICMPv4, I quite liked the Babel
solution in RFC 9229 (use any routable v4 address if you have one,
otherw
I support adoption. At Google we're interested in potentially using
draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd to configure MASQUE proxies and VPNs.
I can commit to reviewing the document as it progresses, and I'll try to
see if we can also participate in interop efforts.
David
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2
Hi Josh,
I agree with you that the world has changed a lot since WPAD was defined in
1997. The Web has changed, and the use of proxies has changed with it. Now
that HTTPS is ubiquitous, transparent caching proxies are pretty much
extinct and proxies are mainly used for either filtering or privacy
Hi,
I read through draft-ietf-intarea-multicast-application-port-00. Overall,
I'm very supportive of this work. A few comments:
I just made this point at the microphone in Madrid, but I'll expand on it
here: a lot of OSes do not use the IETF Dynamic Ports range of 49152–65535
for ephemeral ports.
