Hi All,
This is just a notification of publication of the -00 draft referred to in the
subject.
We, as the authors, welcome any discussions around this draft and look forward
to receiving feedback from the working group.
Thanks
Andrew.
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-raviolli-
Andrew
From: Adrian Farrel
Date: Tuesday, 28 March 2023 at 11:24
To: Andrew Alston - IETF , int-area@ietf.org
Cc: spr...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Int-area] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-raviolli-intarea-trusted-domain-srv6-00.txt
[Spring cc’ed because, well, you know, SR. I wonder
to provide an option that does not
interfere with existing srv6 to those that may want to use the technology, but
aren’t comfortable using it in the absence of this mechanism.
Thanks
Andrew
From: Robert Raszuk
Date: Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 10:30
To: Andrew Alston - IETF
Cc: adr
mpella
Cc: Adrian Farrel ; Andrew Alston - IETF
; int-area@ietf.org ;
spr...@ietf.org ; Dr. Tony Przygienda
Subject: RE: [spring] [Int-area] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-raviolli-intarea-trusted-domain-srv6-00.txt
On second thought, if we had the new ethertype, we wouldn’t need the n
Latest version of the draft that aims to address comments received so far has
been posted.
Comments/reviews appreciated as always.
Thanks
Andrew
A new version of I-D, draft-raviolli-intarea-trusted-domain-srv6-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Andrew Alston and posted to the
IETF repo
