Moin,
I just had a stupid idea in the context of v4-w-v6-nh: Why don't we
just do NDP? The obvious answer is: Because NDP does not support IPv4.
The more complex one is: Well, actually... why not?
RFC4291 gives us 'IPv4-ComIPv4-Compatible IPv6 Addresspatible IPv6
Address[es]' in Sec. 2.5.5.1 to
> I just had a stupid idea in the context of v4-w-v6-nh: Why don't we
> just do NDP?
V4-via-v6 uses NDP. Actually, the main difference between ordinary IPv4
next-hop routing and v4-via-v6 is that the latter uses NDP where the
former uses ARP.
> Technically, there is nothing that keeps a v6 only
FYI - This report has been deleted as junk.
Thank you,
RFC Editor/mc
> On Apr 4, 2025, at 4:00 PM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6864,
> "Updated Specification of the IPv4 ID Field".
>
> --
> You may
