[Int-area] Re: I-D Action: draft-wkumari-intarea-safe-limited-domains-04.txt

Hi Tal, On 06-Mar-25 19:28, Tal Mizrahi wrote: Hi, My main concern about this draft is that I did not feel that it 'does what it says on the box'. When I read the title and abstract, my first thought was that this looks like the standard track version of RFC8799. However, after reading through

[Int-area] Re: I-D Action: draft-wkumari-intarea-safe-limited-domains-04.txt

Hi, My main concern about this draft is that I did not feel that it 'does what it says on the box'. When I read the title and abstract, my first thought was that this looks like the standard track version of RFC8799. However, after reading through it, I believe that the main focus is Ethertype-bas