I’ve reviewed -02 and support it. This seems like a simple and useful
improvement.
T
> On Nov 21, 2024, at 8:19 AM, Ron Bonica - rbonica=40juniper.net at
> dmarc.ietf.org wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> I have just posted a new version of the draft to address your comment.
>
>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 7:45 AM Ron Bonica
wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> Good idea!
>
> We could make it an 8-bit field representing 4 bytes of options.
>
> So:
>
> everything in the header is 8-bit aligned
> we can still support 1,024 bytes of options!
Hi Ron,
Thanks for changing that, but can you align
Dear IntArea WG,
As discussed at the IETF 121 meeting, we are starting a 2-week WG call for
adoption of PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-fenner-intarea-probe-clarification-02.html
The document has been discussed for some time and it has seen good sup
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024, 4:19 PM Ron Bonica wrote:
> Tom,
>
> That thought crossed my mind last week. So, I posted a version 02
> immediately after posting version 01.
>
> The fix is in version 02. Also added you to the acknowledgement section.
>
Ron,
Looks good! I support adoption.
Tom
> Happy
Tom,
That thought crossed my mind last week. So, I posted a version 02 immediately
after posting version 01.
The fix is in version 02. Also added you to the acknowledgement section.
Happy Thanksgiving,
