Brian, RFC2675 standard jumbograms cannot support the transmission of these
multi-segment buffers
(i.e., parcels) between peer end systems across an arbitrary Internetwork. The
source end system needs
to insert sufficient ancillary information so that the destination end system
can determine the
Thank you, Mike. The inclusion of UDP options in parcels/AJs is really
straightforward and I think
could be done as an update to the base UDP options spec at some later time if
you don’t think the
time is ripe to tackle it now. The idea is that parcels/AJs that are no larger
than 64KB will use U
Hi, Fred,
Please review the UDP options doc. There is no “end *following* UDP options”;
the options consume the entire surplus space.
I don’t know yet how or whether parcels with larger than 64K can work with UDP
options, but at this time, it does seem premature to even bother with such
things
> On Sep 30, 2024, at 8:08 AM, Templin (US), Fred L
> wrote:
>
> > Please review the UDP options doc. There is no “end *following* UDP
> > options”; the options consume the entire surplus space.
>
> Yes, so IP parcels and AJs will update the base UDP options spec. For IP
> parcels and AJs,
> On Sep 30, 2024, at 8:41 AM, Templin (US), Fred L
> wrote:
>
> >> For parcels/AJs >= 64K, the overall length appears in the Parcel Payload
> >> Length of the HBH option and
> >> the UDP length is set to 0. The IP parcels draft specifies that UDP Length
> >> = 0 means that there will be
> >>
Hi Joe, annotations below again:
Thank you - Fred
From: to...@strayalpha.com
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 8:57 AM
To: Templin (US), Fred L
Cc: Brian Carpenter ; Gorry (erg)
; Tim Chown ; Internet Area
; IPv6 List ; tsvwg IETF list
Subject: Re: UDP options [was IP Parcels and Advanced Jum
Dear IntArea WG,
The adoption call has concluded. We have received only positive answers
indicating a clear support.
We would like to request authors to submit an updated version as WG document.
Thanks,
Wassim & Juan Carlos
(IntArea WG chairs)
On 9/5/24, 3:36 AM, "Wassim Haddad" wrote:
Dear
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-intarea-extended-icmp-nodeid-00.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group (INTAREA) WG
of the IETF.
Title: Extending ICMP for Node Identification
Authors: Bill Fenner
Reji Thomas
Name:draft-ietf-intarea-extended-
