023 04:25
> To: Luigi IANNONE ; Evan Pratten
>
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] New -00 draft: draft-augustyn-intarea-ipref-00
>
> It can certainly be used. The references are only carried up to the gateway
> where they're used to produce local I
he general case, references reduce privacy w.r.t.
other technologies like e.g. NAT.
This should be discussed in the document.
Ciao
L.
-Original Message-
From: Int-area On Behalf Of Evan Pratten
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2023 20:04
To: waldemar
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [In
.
This should be discussed in the document.
Ciao
L.
> -Original Message-
> From: Int-area On Behalf Of Evan Pratten
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2023 20:04
> To: waldemar
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] New -00 draft: draft-augustyn-intarea-i
Yes, the edge router may, but does not have to, perform IPREF mapping.
It can pass to any router withing the private network.
On 2/15/23 11:04, Evan Pratten wrote:
Ya, I guess using non-ip-addresses for the refs is a good idea for
networks that involve non IP-based hops.
Would it be possible t
Ya, I guess using non-ip-addresses for the refs is a good idea for
networks that involve non IP-based hops.
Would it be possible to have a router do reference pass-through? I'm
thinking of a kind of double-NAT situation where I might want router 1
to delegate the routing of refs to router 2.
WAN
I was not thinking of chaining, this sounds like source routing, I am
not sure. Cascading is certainly possible. The destination may rewrite
one IPREF address into another IPREF address. This could be done
multiple times.
I wanted to avoid any sort of negotiations, any kind of time dependency,
I find this very interesting.
Would it be possible to chain references? for example
10.0.0.1+700+800? I can't think of a use case for this, but I'm sure
it would cross someone's mind to try.
The way I see this, IPREF is essentially encoding some or all of the
route to the final host in the addres
