James Thomas writes:
> Björn Bidar wrote:
>
>> James Thomas writes:
>>
>>> Björn Bidar wrote:
>>>
Currently I'm building threads by reference
(gnus-gather-threads-by-references). But I noticed that replies from
those that read from nntp and reply via nntp/Gmane break the threading
Björn Bidar wrote:
> James Thomas writes:
>
>> Björn Bidar wrote:
>>
>>> Currently I'm building threads by reference
>>> (gnus-gather-threads-by-references). But I noticed that replies from
>>> those that read from nntp and reply via nntp/Gmane break the threading
>>> as the reference to the origi
James Thomas writes:
> Björn Bidar wrote:
>
>> Currently I'm building threads by reference
>> (gnus-gather-threads-by-references). But I noticed that replies from
>> those that read from nntp and reply via nntp/Gmane break the threading
>> as the reference to the original threat seems to be missi
Björn Bidar wrote:
> Currently I'm building threads by reference
> (gnus-gather-threads-by-references). But I noticed that replies from
> those that read from nntp and reply via nntp/Gmane break the threading
> as the reference to the original threat seems to be missing or
> different.
>
> Did any
Hello,
Currently I'm building threads by reference
(gnus-gather-threads-by-references). But I noticed that replies from
those that read from nntp and reply via nntp/Gmane break the threading
as the reference to the original threat seems to be missing or
different.
Did anyone found any workaroun
