Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

Albert Reiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And Slime is only designed to help with Common Lisp. Don't forget SLIME48 with Scheme 48, which is SLIME for Scheme. -- Aaron Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Extend beyond the Mortal . . . ." "They th

Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johan Bockgård) writes: > Eldoc mode. > (find-function-setup-keys) > Johan Bockgård thank you very much -- continua pure a nasconderti dietro a chi ti vuole bene, sei fortunato ad avere amici generosi che sprecano tempo a difenderti anche su un gruppo che tu consideri invece u

Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> 5. O'Reilly has a book called something like Extending Emacs or Emacs >>> Lisp Programming - I can't quite remember. It has some handy tips. > >> I have "Writing GNU Emacs Extensions" on my shelf which is quite nice. > >> But back to being off-topic:

Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

>> 5. O'Reilly has a book called something like Extending Emacs or Emacs >> Lisp Programming - I can't quite remember. It has some handy tips. > I have "Writing GNU Emacs Extensions" on my shelf which is quite nice. > But back to being off-topic: Is there some kind of debugger and > inspector fo

Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

Tim X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 5. O'Reilly has a book called something like Extending Emacs or Emacs >Lisp Programming - I can't quite remember. It has some handy tips. I have "Writing GNU Emacs Extensions" on my shelf which is quite nice. But back to being off-topic: Is there some kin

Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

Sébastien Vauban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > >>> But my ultimate goal would be to try enjoying all the features >>> of Slime for debugging Emacs Lisp code I want to maintain... >>> >>> And, *not* being an expert at all in both languages, I don't >>> know if their differences are so big

Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

Sébastien Vauban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For example, how do you get the display of a function's arguments > list in the minibuffer? Very very useful. Eldoc mode. (add-hook 'emacs-lisp-mode-hook 'turn-on-eldoc-mode) (add-hook 'lisp-interaction-mode-hook 'turn-on-eldoc-mode) (ad

Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

Hello, >> But my ultimate goal would be to try enjoying all the features >> of Slime for debugging Emacs Lisp code I want to maintain... >> >> And, *not* being an expert at all in both languages, I don't >> know if their differences are so big it's purely impossible to >> do what I want, or if it'

Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

Sébastien Vauban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I've just installed Slime and CLisp. Very good choice, I think. > > But my ultimate goal would be to try enjoying all the features > of Slime for debugging Emacs Lisp code I want to maintain... > but, when compiling my Emacs Lisp code, it r

Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp

[Sébastien Vauban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:23:16 GMT]: > I've just installed Slime and CLisp. Very good choice, I think. Indeed, but for Common Lisp: Clisp is one of many implementations of Common Lisp, which is a completely different kind of Lisp than Emacs Lisp. And Slime is on

Slime and Emacs Lisp

Hello, I've just installed Slime and CLisp. Very good choice, I think. But my ultimate goal would be to try enjoying all the features of Slime for debugging Emacs Lisp code I want to maintain... but, when compiling my Emacs Lisp code, it reports many errors, like: o undefined function NIL