Hi all!
I'm in the process of upgrading cyrus-imapd-2.2.13 (from
Debian-3.1/Sarge) to cyrus-imapd-2.3.7 (from RHEL-5/CentOS-5) on a
system with approx. 25k mailboxes.
We are using quite simple sieve scripts for vacation and 2.3.7
duplicates (into the local inbox) all emails which trigger an outgo
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 16:49 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
[...]
> > I'm in the process of upgrading cyrus-imapd-2.2.13 (from
> > Debian-3.1/Sarge) to cyrus-imapd-2.3.7 (from RHEL-5/CentOS-5) on a
> > system with approx. 25k mailboxes.
> >
> > We are using quite simple sieve scripts for vacation a
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:49 -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
[]
> > If I add a "vacation" statement (with a known working local email
> > address) as in
> > snip
> > require [ "fileinto", &qu
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:22 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
[...]
> I'm in the process of upgrading cyrus-imapd-2.2.13 (from
> Debian-3.1/Sarge) to cyrus-imapd-2.3.7 (from RHEL-5/CentOS-5) on a
> system with approx. 25k mailboxes.
>
> We are using quite simple sieve scri
Hi all!
We are running cyrus-imapd with all files (mailboxes, Berkeley-DB,
mmap()ed files) on an ext3 filesystem (with data=ordered) on a iSCSI
block device (and the actual storage is on a NetApp box if that matters)
on a Xeon 3.2GHz CPU (with 4 cores/2 HT thread - ).
The kernel is 2.6.18-128.el5
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 16:26 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
[ problems with delivery.db]
> > Any hints or questions or feedback or ... is greatly appreciated,
[...]
> As a first step I suggest to get rid of the Berkeley-DB files and convert
> them to skiplist.
I knew I forgot something in the last mail
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 16:56 +0200, Michael Menge wrote:
[...]
> Quoting Bernd Petrovitsch :
[...]
> > We are running cyrus-imapd with all files (mailboxes, Berkeley-DB,
> > mmap()ed files) on an ext3 filesystem (with data=ordered) on a iSCSI
> > block device (and the actual s
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:51 +1000, Rob Mueller wrote:
> > - cyrus-imapd-2.3.7 (from RHEL5/CentOS-5) with some minor patches in the
> > popd (UUID format and an enhancement to the authentication - both
> > shouldn't have any impact on the storage part)
>
> As I'm sure others will mention, this is
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 15:33 -0700, Vincent Fox wrote:
[...]
> Really I've looked at fsck too many times in my life and
> don't ever want to again. Anyone who tells me "oh yes but
Especially not in the >100GB area.
[...]
> The antiquated filesystems that 99% of admins tolerate and
> work with every
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:50 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
[...]
> The interesting point is that the discussion started as a ZFS vs.
> $ANY_OTHER_FS thing but it quickly turns out that the filesystem is only
> one part of the picture. If your storage fails on the block level I doubt
> the filesystem ma
App thing AFAIK) also works without a problem -
but I suspect that things are far from any hardware limits.
Of course, "nodiratime" on the mounts. Never tried "noatime" though.
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : be...@petrovitsch.priv.at
11 matches
Mail list logo
