Simon Matter wrote:
>> Simon Matter wrote:
>> snipped a bunch of stuff to keep things readable<<
>> I seem to have scripts created by both websieve and avelsieve, but I
>> do
>> know that we have been managing sieve through squirrelmail for a very
>> long time. Looks like the we
First off, thank you to everyone who's chimed in with extremely helpful
suggestions in response to my previous message. Some of them have helped
performance, and others mysteriously haven't when I really thought they
would, but it's been very helpful for me in untying this knot. I've been
too
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:51:42AM -0500, Michael Bacon wrote:
>
> I have two questions regarding the Murder architecture. The first is just
> a general annoyance at the way master starts up the mupdate processes. In
> order to get master to fire off anything, you have to set prefork=1.
> How
You can avoid the behavior in your second question by setting
mupdate_config: unified
in your proxies imapd.conf. That was a long standing issue with
murder in a large scale environment with cyrus 2.2.
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 @ 11:51, Michael Bacon wrote:
> The second one is that the code
--On November 10, 2009 11:11:41 AM -0600 Gary Mills
wrote:
> I finally fixed that one, but it took a long time to find the reason.
> I always had two copies of the mupdate master running, but one of them
> did almost nothing...
>
> # ps -fp "$(pgrep mupdate)"
> UID PID PPID C
I saw this recommendation elsewhere, but I don't understand why one would
set mupdate_config: unified if I'm not, in fact, running a unified murder.
What's the gain here? We have dedicated front-end boxes and dedicated
back-end boxes. Is this just sort of a, "yeah, it's not for that, but it
d
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 @ 12:37, Michael Bacon wrote:
> I saw this recommendation elsewhere, but I don't understand why one
> would set mupdate_config: unified if I'm not, in fact, running a
> unified murder. What's the gain here? We have dedicated front-end
> boxes and dedicated back-end box
Hello,
If I do a SETQUOTA and GETQUOTA should I be using bytes or kilobytes? Sorry,
this is probably obvious to most people but I am rather new at it.
I'm connecting with "fsockopen" since I'm right on the server... just in case
how you connect makes a difference.
--
Nybbles2Byte
--On November 10, 2009 1:23:33 PM -0500 Brian Awood
wrote:
> Unfortunately it's not well documented, but the unified murder config
> currently only works on a proxy host. Don't try to configure it on
> a "backend" machine that has local mailboxes!!! Unless you want to
> manually fix up the mai
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:10 -0800, Nybbles2Byte wrote:
> Hello,
> If I do a SETQUOTA and GETQUOTA should I be using bytes or kilobytes?
> Sorry, this is probably obvious to most people but I am rather new at
> it.
KB. So "sq user.me 384000" is 384MB.
> I'm connecting with "fsockopen" since I'm r
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 9. November 2009 08:37:46 -0300 Reinaldo de Carvalho
wrote:
You need analyse the I/O consumition.
# iostat -d 1
I trust real world experiences more than benchmarks ... either people on
this list have successfully run Cyrus under ESX or the
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 9. November 2009 14:10:54 +0100 Simon Matter
wrote:
While virtualization has advantages it has also disadvantages. One thing
is that it introduces an additional layer of complexity into the game.
It's my impression that in many areas virtuali
How can you get ipurge to only work on the INBOX? If I try this nothing
happens:
ipurge -d 31 user.spam
If I put in -f then the INBOX and every folder underneath gets processed.
man page seems to indicate that only processing the INBOX is not possible:
Ipurge by default only deletes mail bel
13 matches
Mail list logo
