Re: Does Cyrus benefit greatly from increased FS buffer cache?

--On 16. April 2009 10:58:15 +1000 Rob Mueller wrote: http://blog.fastmail.fm/2007/09/21/reiserfs-bugs-32-bit-vs-64-bit-kernel s-cache-vs-inode-memory/ Anyone have any specific thoughts? Is there any other benefit we might see from large memory allocation in 64-bit architecture? Given that

Re: restore seen file

So thank you all and specially John Widera for your help, Just a simple replace of the new seen file by an old one allowed me to restore the seen flag on thousand mails. Andreas Winkelmann a écrit : > Am Mittwoch 15 April 2009 14:56:32 schrieb Mathieu Kretchner: > > >> No answer ! >> >> So coul

Re: restore seen file

Here you could find the discussion between John and I about the topic : > > John Widera a écrit : >> >> Glad it worked. >> >> >>> >>> yes it's working, thanks a lot for the time you've spent teach me how >>> >>> to >>> >>> do. >>> >>> We also have a webmail app running, whenever people

WG: Message contains NUL characters - howto dump?

Please, can somebody help me? Maybe, it's a problem in the cyrus lmtp-daemon? (I don't think so...) thx Klemens - Weitergeleitete Nachricht - Datum: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:18:46 +0200 (CEST) Von: Klemens Puritscher An: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Betreff: *POSSIBLE SPAM* Messag

Question about bulk mailbox transfers between backends

Hi folks, We're currently running a Cyrus 2.3.8 murder and are looking to bulk move several hundred mailboxes from one backend server to another (running either 2.3.8 or 2.3.14). We've done successful tests of single transfers using cyradm's xfer command, but I'm wondering if anyone's already

Re: Does Cyrus benefit greatly from increased FS buffer cache?

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > --On 16. April 2009 10:58:15 +1000 Rob Mueller wrote: > >>> http://blog.fastmail.fm/2007/09/21/reiserfs-bugs-32-bit-vs-64-bit-kernel >>> s-cache-vs-inode-memory/ >>> >>> Anyone have any specific thoughts? Is there any other benefit we might >>> s

Re: Question about bulk mailbox transfers between backends

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Kendrick Hernandez wrote: > Hi folks, > > We're currently running a Cyrus 2.3.8 murder and are looking to bulk move > several hundred mailboxes from one backend server to another (running either > 2.3.8 or 2.3.14). > > We've done successful tests of single transfers using cyra

Re: Does Cyrus benefit greatly from increased FS buffer cache?

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: --On 16. April 2009 10:58:15 +1000 Rob Mueller wrote: http://blog.fastmail.fm/2007/09/21/reiserfs-bugs-32-bit-vs-64-bit-kernel s-cache-vs-inode-memory/ Anyone have any specific thoughts? Is there any other benefit we might see from large memory

Re: Does Cyrus benefit greatly from increased FS buffer cache?

-- Andrew Morgan is rumored to have mumbled on 16. April 2009 09:52:15 -0700 regarding Re: Does Cyrus benefit greatly from increased FS buffer cache?: So it would seem that a 64-bit kernel wouldn't improve on that, right? Or is that a difference between 2.4 and 2.6? That's interesting, and