Hi,
Ken Murchison wrote:
I wouldn't hold out hope of anything being available in "some months".
I wrote my replication code two years ago, and submitted it to Rob
and Ken about this time last year. Neither I or they have put any
significant work into the code since then. As I indicated in my
pre
Terry.Poperszky wrote:
With Courier, I have the ability to spread access to the mail spool
directory across several incoming smtp servers, is Cyrus able to do
something similar? What I am referring too, is having multiple incoming
email servers, with their mail spools being NFS mounts to a singl
What do people think about a bounty program like horde's:
http://www.horde.org/bounties/
Basically people can make paypal donations to fund certain features.
For something like the high availability support, Im guessing that ALOT
of people would donate small to large amounts of cash to see this
Earl R Shannon wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to get some feedback on how people measure usage on thier
IMAP servers by their users/clients. Have you built any tools to
do this? I have found and am looking over the logwatch stuff in
the wiki, but am curious about the possible existance of other tools,
and
Lee wrote:
What do people think about a bounty program like horde's:
http://www.horde.org/bounties/
Basically people can make paypal donations to fund certain features. For
something like the high availability support, Im guessing that ALOT of
people would donate small to large amounts of cash to
That does take care of it. Thanks!
Jason Alderfer
Information Systems
Eastern Mennonite University
Christian Stuellenberg wrote:
Jason Alderfer sagte:
I've discovered what appears to be a bug in the header folding code of
lmtpd. Cyrus-2.2.8 on Slackware Linux 9.1, 2.4 kernel. It occurs only
unde
Hello All,
I would be willing to pay for this function. Though I am just a startup, and
have very little capital. Most I could prolly do is $100 to $200. Not much.
My fear, which maybe the fear of others is the risk of putting money in, but
there not being enough support by others to reach the
I imagine for a big project like this, refunds could be given. I think
its more a matter of finding someone to deal with this. Id be happy to
do it, but i think it would be best if Ken or another core developer
that everyone knows and already trusts is in charge of holding the
cash. Any Ideas K
--On Thursday, September 16, 2004 18:13 -0400 Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
P.S. Ken, not sure if this would be easier or more complex, but another
alternative here might be to write a mysql backend to cyrus, which would
eliminate the need to worry about redundancy given mysql's multimaster
fu
Lee wrote:
I imagine for a big project like this, refunds could be given. I think
its more a matter of finding someone to deal with this. Id be happy to
do it, but i think it would be best if Ken or another core developer
that everyone knows and already trusts is in charge of holding the cash.
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
Question: Are people looking at this as both redundancy and performance, or
just redundance?
for performance we already have murder, what we currently lack is
redundancy. once we have redundancy then the next enhancement is going to
be to teach murder
--On Thursday, September 16, 2004 6:56 PM -0400 Ken Murchison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
Question: Are people looking at this as both redundancy and
performance, or just redundance?
Cyrus performs pretty well already. Background redundancy would be awesome.
Especially if we had control o
Hello,
Question: Are people looking at this as both redundancy and
performance, or just redundance?
My $0.02 worth. Performance gains can be found the traditional way, ie,
faster hardware, etc.Our biggest need is for redundance. If something
goes wrong on one machine we still need to be able
Hi all:
Does cyrus-imapd server have the limit of long size of mailbox name?
For example:
A virtual domain named: my.example.com
And the login name is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any limit with the login name? If yes, what's it?
Thanx
Wang
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki
--On Thursday, September 16, 2004 22:14 -0400 Earl Shannon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Question: Are people looking at this as both redundancy and
performance, or just redundance?
My $0.02 worth. Performance gains can be found the traditional way, ie,
faster hardware, etc.Our biggest n
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 18:56 -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I think this would cause performance to suffer greatly. I think what we
> want is "lazy" replication, where the client gets instant results from
> the machine its connected to, and the replication is done in the
> background. I believe
Hi,
Eric S. Pulley wrote:
Question: Are people looking at this as both redundancy and
performance, or just redundance?
Cyrus performs pretty well already. Background redundancy would be
awesome. Especially if we had control over when the syncing process
occurred either via time interval or date
mysql does not have multi-master functionality, and it's replication,
is quite honestly, a joke. You may have mis-spoken and are talking
about the up-and-coming mysql cluster or the mysql max product (both
of which i'm much less familiar with).
Indeed i was talking about mysql cluster (which i
18 matches
Mail list logo
