> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:43:44 -0800,
> Rob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (rt) writes:
rt> (I know a lot of people swear by postfix, but I stick with sendmail
rt> because I know the product and in this world of nasty hackers, using
rt> an unfamiliar MTA is a very scarry thought. But does an
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Rob Tanner wrote:
> privileges. Since all the mailboxes are owned by the Cyrus user, what
> would be more secure of a system that just does mail delivery woulkd
> be a hack to sendmail so that once it attaches to port 25 it drops root
> and runs as the Cyrus user. Show m
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Andrew K Bressen wrote:
> http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/
> or some linux distributed filesystem
> to replicate a mailstore back and forth between two machines
> with similar cyrus or uwash imap configurations.
> if one machine crashes, you st
Hi,
if imtest is called with a client certificate (and the local ca cert has
been specified with tls_ca_file in /etc/imapd.conf) the imapd_userid
variable is set cmd_starttls() to external.auth_id, which is set in
tls_start_servertls to the CN part of the subject in the client cert.
>From the log
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 07:54:40PM -0500, Alain Turbide wrote:
> The approach I've tested here is using a linux server with a ReiserFS
> partition replicated between 2 nodes using DRBD. Heartbeat runs on both
> systems and will switch the slave node to master in the event of a failure
> in the Ma
Cillian Sharkey wrote:
> Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It never occured to me before, but I don't think there is a way of
> > disabling the quota once it's been set. Probably deleting the user and
> > recreating it would work.
>
> Or another way is to just delete the quota f
>> privileges. Since all the mailboxes are owned by the Cyrus user, what
>> would be more secure of a system that just does mail delivery woulkd
>> be a hack to sendmail so that once it attaches to port 25 it drops root
>> and runs as the Cyrus user. Show me a hack like that, and Cyrus wins
Hello,
In the past, I have seen several mentions of patches to Cyrus to allow it
to serve virtual domains. Does anyone have a collection of these patches
available and further, what are the realistic chances of having something
like this rolled into the main release?
I have been struggling to g
Hi people,
I'm a newbie to Cyrus, but I'm liking what I'm seeing sofar. I'm planning
a migration of our company mail-server to cyrus, mainly because we want to
use subfolders in imap and because we'd like some shared mailboxes without
having the associated Linux-users.
I've got the Cyrus imap da
I figured out the problem, thanks largely to Jean-Michel Doublet.
I enabled debugging on the LMTP daemon that had the socket open (in cyrus.conf,
'cmd="lmtpd -a"'), and saw that it was trying to create a directory called
"/var/spool/imap/stage." which already existed.
By removing that directory,
Hi all.
[TIA]
I just compiled the latest version of Cyrus (tried CVS version too). The compile
itself goes smoothly, no problems. But, when thats done I try to run cyradm and
it fails to see the SASL libs.
Which perl/makefile needs fixing?
venus# ldconfig -r |grep sasl
71:-lsasl.8
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Gilion Goudsmit wrote:
>
> I used the following to send something
> to my mailbox:
>
> cat /etc/printcap | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver-wrapper giel
> cat /etc/printcap | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver-wrapper user.giel
> cat /etc/printcap | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver giel
> cat /etc/printcap |
Almost all ISPs that are using Cyrus+LDAP etc are doing similar things.
You may like to have a look at
http://ispman.sourceforge.net
The software was built to fullfill these requirements.
cheers
"Kevin M. Myer" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the past, I have seen several mentions of patches to Cyrus
Your email 1031055, Fri, 16 Mar 2001 04:03:41 +0800 containing HTML junk is not wanted
here for security reasons. It has been bounced without human intervention.
-- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. --
Received: from james.berdmann.de ([192.168.1.1])
by e
Excellent catch. This looks like a bug; as you might've guessed, we
don't yet use client side authentication with STARTTLS, and this code
was only tested a few times when it was first inserted.
I'll apply the patch you suggest.
The dn mapping is an open problem across multiple protocols and
aut
** The following is an automated reply from ADMIN **
I will be away from the office 3-10-2001 to 3-21-2001.
Your e-mail will be stored and I will read it upon my return.
In the interim, please direct all requests to the following
individuals according to your needs:
* All computer work order
>cat /etc/printcap | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver giel
deliver expects that the file you hand it will be
rfc-822 compliant; ie, it has to look like
a mail message, not just any old file.
Make sure it doesn't have a berkeley mailbox seperator
in the header, either. This is the line that begins
wit
Hi,
I've gone over and over my configuration, of which there's not much to
configure, and I'm completely baffled. I'm running (or trying to) sasl
1.5.24, cyrus imap 2.0.12 on a Solaris 2.7 system. This is what I've
configured:
imap was buit with:
--with-auth=unix
SASL was built with:
--
> Make sure it doesn't have a berkeley mailbox seperator
> in the header, either. This is the line that begins
> with "From " (as opposed to the one that starts "From:",
> which is ok).
for people who *really* don't want to get rid of (or can't
get rid of) leading "From " lines..
http://gigo.com
Do I have to accept e-mail for unknown users? or can I have sendmail check
that the user actually exists when e-mail comes in? If so...is there
documentation on doing this anywhere?
I remember seeing something about this on this list quite awhile ago, but I
can't find it by searching the archives
If sendmail doesn't know where to deliver the mail, it should bounce
it. In fact, that's the normal behavior. When the mail gets bounced,
Postmaster will get a notification, and that notification is typically
in multi-part MIME and includes the original message as an attachment.
You might co
It does bounce it...but why can't I block it during the incoming SMTP
transmission instead of replying "250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient ok"?
-
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Rob Tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 19:50
To: Josh Miller; Cyrus-Info
Subjec
23 matches
Mail list logo
