On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Some months ago I was using Courier+Postfix+OpenLDAP+Phamm
> (http://www.phamm.org).
> I'm not developer but I understood a little of phamm's code to realize
> that it would not be difficult to use it with Cyrus.
>
> I'm planning to use Phamm ag
Jason Voorhees schrieb:
> I'm planning to use Phamm again but this time with Cyrus. First I need
> to know how to execute cyrus tasks without cyradm (creating mailboxes,
> setting/changing quota, remove mailboxes, etc). I was thinking about
> cyradm + expect but it's just an idea by now.
Becaus
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Hello Adam,
Thanks for your hint
I'll definitely try those tool
have a nice time
>> I'm planning to use Phamm again but this time with Cyrus. First I need
>> to know how to execute cyrus tasks without cyradm (creating mailboxes,
>> setting/changing quota, remove mai
> I'm planning to use Phamm again but this time with Cyrus. First I need
> to know how to execute cyrus tasks without cyradm (creating mailboxes,
> setting/changing quota, remove mailboxes, etc).
All of these tasks, AFAIK, can be performed via IMAP. So I'd image they
are performed the same way
Hi:
Some months ago I was using Courier+Postfix+OpenLDAP+Phamm
(http://www.phamm.org).
I'm not developer but I understood a little of phamm's code to realize
that it would not be difficult to use it with Cyrus.
I'm planning to use Phamm again but this time with Cyrus. First I need
to know how
On Sep 18, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Vincent Fox wrote:
> All I know is this:
>
> After running ZFS for the Cyrus mailstores for a year now I'd never
> go back.
Same here, for over year now... four opteron servers to handle 25,000
accounts. All of those servers are Solaris 10 and cyrus lives and
w
David Lang wrote:
> and gaining some new worries along the way. while some are convinced that ZFS
> is
> the best thing ever others see it as trading a set of known problems for a
> set
> of unknown problems (plus it severly limits what OS you can run, which can
> bring
> it's own set of prob
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 03:28 -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 21:12 -0700, David Lang wrote:
> >> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
> >>> On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
> Why does cyrus need it's own
>
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 22:28 -0700, Scott M. Likens wrote:
> ...
> I debated writing a gui for Cyrus for administration, but I realized
> that people implement Cyrus in so many different ways. Kerberos, LDAP,
> *SQL, various forms of PAM. Then you add in virtual domains, and how
> you might wan
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 21:12 -0700, David Lang wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
>>> On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
Why does cyrus need it's own
structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not who
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 21:12 -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
> > On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
> >> Why does cyrus need it's own
> >> structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
> >> compatible, to maildir. Maildir and cyrus b
David Lang wrote, at 09/18/2008 12:12 AM:
> doign a quick google check on maildir it also appears that maildir is not as
> standard as people think it is, it's defined almost entirely by the
> implementation (DJB started it, but never worked to turn it into a standard
> for
> others to use)
Th
> so you have OS X and Solaris (with opensolaris varients), that's not
> a very wide
> supproted base for running servers.
FreeBSD 7.x onwards has ZFS available natively. ZFS support in CURRENT
seems to have most of the latest stuff from OpenSolaris incorporated
and the FS seems to be pretty st
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Scott M. Likens wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> If you want ZFS you have several choices, OS X (Leopard), as there is a
> development version that supports RAID-Z and works quite well. You
> can't boot off of it, but that will change in Snow Leopard.
>
> Additionally you can use Opens
Hi David,
If you want ZFS you have several choices, OS X (Leopard), as there is a
development version that supports RAID-Z and works quite well. You
can't boot off of it, but that will change in Snow Leopard.
Additionally you can use Opensolaris such as Nexenta, or you can use
fuse to get ZFS
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Scott M. Likens wrote:
> With ZFS your leaving a "ton" of stone-age worries behind. You can go
> much beyond inodes in the perks of ZFS.
and gaining some new worries along the way. while some are convinced that ZFS
is
the best thing ever others see it as trading a set of k
(+84) 04 5 742 857
>> Mobi: (+84) 0904 34 38 38
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Bakshi
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 1:17 PM
>> To: lartc
>> Cc: Cyrus Mailing List
>>
With ZFS your leaving a "ton" of stone-age worries behind. You can go
much beyond inodes in the perks of ZFS.
Vincent Fox wrote:
> Wesley Craig wrote:
>
>>> Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
>>> disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.),
>>>
> With ZFS, inodes are
On Behalf Of J. Bakshi
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 1:17 PM
> To: lartc
> Cc: Cyrus Mailing List
> Subject: Re: suggestion need to design an email system.
>
> lartc wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> well, you can edit the gosa config file to only show you the u
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
> On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
>> Why does cyrus need it's own
>> structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
>> compatible, to maildir. Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
>> disadvantages (huge needs in terms
Wesley Craig wrote:
>> Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
>> disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.),
With ZFS, inodes are among the many stone-age worries you leave behind.
;-)
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
> Why does cyrus need it's own
> structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
> compatible, to maildir. Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
> disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.), yet I see no
> distinctive adv
Hello,
2008/9/17 Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Another thing which really intrigued me was the inherent
>> cluster-ability of dovecot, which is a huge PITA to get to run on
>> cyrus (as I have just implemented it a couple of months ago). Yet I
>> only have read about it in the documentation
> Another thing which really intrigued me was the inherent
> cluster-ability of dovecot, which is a huge PITA to get to run on
> cyrus (as I have just implemented it a couple of months ago). Yet I
> only have read about it in the documentation, and not actually seen it
> in action. But at least the
Heya :)
2008/9/17 Adam Tauno Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I noticed that dovecot and cyrus don't differ that much in speed to
>> each other. Both seem to excel at certain points, while being weaker
>> at another. But overall the performance on a huge mailbox seemed to be
>> comparable. Doveco
> I noticed that dovecot and cyrus don't differ that much in speed to
> each other. Both seem to excel at certain points, while being weaker
> at another. But overall the performance on a huge mailbox seemed to be
> comparable. Dovecot seemed to be slightly better at searching in the
> mailbox, esp
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Do Duc Huy wrote:
> My question is about my second problem. It 's about antispam and antivirus.
> I have used amavis for spam and virus filter. This can block virus very well
> but it have no effect in blocking spam mail, I think.
Get the newest version of amavisd-new, and rea
Hi all,
I know I will take some heat for this (as I know this is a cyrus
mailinglist), but I'm going to offer some points for dovecot. I'm all
for informed decisions, where one can weigh points against each other
and decide on that basis.
First of all, I have administrated both courier and cyrus
Wednesday, September 17, 2008 1:17 PM
To: lartc
Cc: Cyrus Mailing List
Subject: Re: suggestion need to design an email system.
lartc wrote:
> hi,
>
> well, you can edit the gosa config file to only show you the users and
> their e-mail, etc. you're not obligated to use the entire system ..
lartc wrote:
> hi,
>
> well, you can edit the gosa config file to only show you the users and
> their e-mail, etc. you're not obligated to use the entire system ...
>
> when install it for clients, i only leave a few pieces of functionality
> (so they don't blow their foot off).
>
> cheers
>
> cha
hi,
well, you can edit the gosa config file to only show you the users and
their e-mail, etc. you're not obligated to use the entire system ...
when install it for clients, i only leave a few pieces of functionality
(so they don't blow their foot off).
cheers
charles
Cyrus Home Page: ht
lartc wrote:
> hi,
>
>
>
>>> another important questing ; Is there
>>> any webinterface which can manage the mail system based on LDAP ?
>>>
>
> yes there is -- and it's great.
>
> https://oss.gonicus.de/labs/gosa/
>
> gosa manages your ldap, and therefore your mail system. takes a bit o
32 matches
Mail list logo
