Dne Po 9. října 2017 13:25:12, Sebastian Hagedorn napsal(a):
> MD5 + TLS is still better than plaintext + TLS, IMHO. It's true that MD5 in
> itself doesn't do much good anymore, but I prefer it anyway.
>
> --On 9. Oktober 2017 um 11:47:46 +0100 Merlin Hartley
>
> wrote:
> > Why would you want to
MD5 + TLS is still better than plaintext + TLS, IMHO. It's true that MD5 in
itself doesn't do much good anymore, but I prefer it anyway.
--On 9. Oktober 2017 um 11:47:46 +0100 Merlin Hartley
wrote:
Why would you want to, you are already using TLS so what do you expect to
gain? plaintext+TLS
Why would you want to, you are already using TLS so what do you expect to gain?
plaintext+TLS
md5 suffers from multiple inadequacies - so it seems pretty pointless to me.
M
--
Merlin Hartley
Computer Officer
MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit
Cambridge, CB2 0XY
United Kingdom
> On 8 Oct 2017, at 21
Hello,
when setting in squirrelmail
$imap_auth_mech = 'cram-md5';
or
$imap_auth_mech = 'digest-md5';
then the following is logged in /etc/maillog
Oct 8 14:59:41 imap-host imaps[2042]: accepted connection
Oct 8 14:59:41 imap-host imaps[2042]: imapd:Loading DH parameters from file
Oct 8 14:59:4
