On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
> >
> > > I c... so that means that global admins have to have unqualified
> > > usernames, which are then qualified with the default domain? If that's the
>
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
>
> > I c... so that means that global admins have to have unqualified
> > usernames, which are then qualified with the default domain? If that's the
> > case, then global admins can only come from the defaul
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
> I c... so that means that global admins have to have unqualified
> usernames, which are then qualified with the default domain? If that's the
> case, then global admins can only come from the defaultdomain? That seems
> kinda.. well, dumb. Why not just
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Christian Schulte wrote:
> Kendrick Vargas schrieb:
> >
> > Ok, Igor, Ken, you both must be growing to hate me, but I'm starting to
> > understand the present need for the defaultdomain paramater. I'm sorry :-)
> >
> > I have a question. Lets say I have a realm "example.com
Kendrick Vargas schrieb:
Hi folks,
Ok, Igor, Ken, you both must be growing to hate me, but I'm starting to
understand the present need for the defaultdomain paramater. I'm sorry :-)
I have a question. Lets say I have a realm "example.com" and I have the
defaultdomain paramater set to "example.co
Hi folks,
Ok, Igor, Ken, you both must be growing to hate me, but I'm starting to
understand the present need for the defaultdomain paramater. I'm sorry :-)
I have a question. Lets say I have a realm "example.com" and I have the
defaultdomain paramater set to "example.com", and I also have "doma
