On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 07:44:04PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Ondrej Sury wrote:
>
> >Ken, would you be so kind to generate patchset (and maybe attach it to
> >mentioned bug report)?
>
> Attached to bug #2690
The last comment in that ticket mentions that the patch is corrupt:
https://bugzilla
Ondrej Sury wrote:
Ken, would you be so kind to generate patchset (and maybe attach it to
mentioned bug report)?
Attached to bug #2690
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--http:/
> > Actually, it's an unsigned 32-bit value, so the limit is 4GB:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2690
> >
> > (Yes, we really do have users who are using more than 4GB of space.)
>
> The limit is still 32-bit signed. It needs to remain unsigned because
> -1 is use
James Ralston wrote:
On 2005-07-05 at 23:00+02 Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- Paul Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on 5. Juli 2005
16:32:52 -0400 regarding Re: quotas not working a x86_64?:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Ken Murchison wrote:
Its possible.
On 2005-07-05 at 23:00+02 Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- Paul Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on 5. Juli 2005
> 16:32:52 -0400 regarding Re: quotas not working a x86_64?:
>
> > On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Ken Murchison wrote:
> >
> > > Its possible. I'm fairly
