age
NOTIFY to idled for mailbox user.martin.west: Resource temporarily
unavailable.
do you have an idea to solve the problem?
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University -
Hello
I have this error:
Apr 5 14:23:39 balprta003 cyrus/imap[76531]: IDLE: error sending message
NOTIFY to idled for mailbox user.martin.west: Resource temporarily
unavailable.
do you have an idea to solve the problem?
Regards,
Paul
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List
Eugene M. Zheganin via Info-cyrus wrote on 10/06/16 16:58:
> idled cmd="idled" listen="/var/imap/socket/idled" proto="udp" prefork=0
That looks like an entry in the SERVICE section. That's wrong for idled.
idled should be added at the end of the START se
Hi.
Recently I've upgraded one of my servers to cyrus-imapd 2.5.x, and
shortly after upgrade I notices that logs are filling with errors like
Jun 10 19:48:03 ns imap[13392]: IDLE: error sending message DONE to
idled for mailbox user.foobar.Sent: Connection refused.
I was not using idled o
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, at 09:09 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote:
> I hope I got that right. The SMS/XMPP thing could be useful if it were
> documented. I'm not sure I'm seeing the utility of the sievenotifier
> setting (send an email to let you know an email has been sent?).
Its useful if you want to notif
On 12/12/2014 05:00 PM, Robert Norris wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 08:37 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote:
>> What calendar is it that is using notifyd like this?
> The notifyd described in that blog post is not the stock Cyrus notifyd,
> but our own custom daemon that speaks the notifyd protocol.
> Che
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014, at 12:22 PM, Robert Norris wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 11:06 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> That said, I'm very tempted to push at least calalarmd back into
>> cyrus-master for 2.5. You don't need to enable it if you don't
>> want it.
>
> I think that's the right thing to d
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 11:06 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> That said, I'm very tempted to push at least calalarmd back into
> cyrus-master for 2.5. You don't need to enable it if you don't
> want it.
I think that's the right thing to do. Alarms are pretty important and
they're hard to implement out
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Robert Norris wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 08:37 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote:
>> What calendar is it that is using notifyd like this?
>
> The notifyd described in that blog post is not the stock Cyrus
> notifyd, but our own custom daemon that speaks the notifyd p
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 08:37 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote:
> What calendar is it that is using notifyd like this?
The notifyd described in that blog post is not the stock Cyrus notifyd,
but our own custom daemon that speaks the notifyd protocol.
Cheers, Rob N.
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrus
On 12/12/2014 04:04 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> http://blog.fastmail.com/2014/12/02/dec-3-push-it-real-good/
>
From this blog post:
"We’ll talk about notifyd first, because it’s the simpler of the two.
The two main styles of events it handles are calendar email
notifications and Sieve (filter/ru
Am Freitag, 12. Dezember 2014, 21:04:44 schrieb Bron Gondwana:
> There's tons of interesting stuff you can do with notify in what will be 2.5
>
> http://blog.fastmail.com/2014/12/02/dec-3-push-it-real-good/
...long awaitet such features - really nice,
so we still await the release of 2.5 when off
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014, at 08:28 PM, Niels Dettenbach wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014, 15:59:42 schrieb Patrick Goetz:
> > Now that I'm going over the entire configuration in great detail, I find
> > out that idled would be pretty useful thing to have running (since we
Am Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014, 15:59:42 schrieb Patrick Goetz:
> Now that I'm going over the entire configuration in great detail, I find
> out that idled would be pretty useful thing to have running (since we
> use mostly the Thunderbird MUA, which supports IDLE), while I'
In my previous debian-based cyrus install idled was commented out in
cyrus.conf, while the notifyd service was set to run. Not knowing any
better, I just left it like this.
Now that I'm going over the entire configuration in great detail, I find
out that idled would be pretty useful thi
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 13:42 -0500, Dan White wrote:
> On 26/09/11 15:21 +0200, Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
> Is idled running as a process? Is it listening on
> /var/lib/imap/socket/idle? Try:
> netstat -l -p | grep
You can check this with "fuser" as well, which is a bit more
&
On 26/09/11 15:21 +0200, Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
>Hello,
>on the impd.log I have plenty of idled errors
>
>Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27607]: error sending to idled: 1
>Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27584]: error sending to idled: 1
>Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27583]: error s
Hello,
on the impd.log I have plenty of idled errors
Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27607]: error sending to idled: 1
Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27584]: error sending to idled: 1
Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27583]: error sending to idled: 1
Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27582]: error sending to idled
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:57:14 +0300, Pascal Gienger
wrote:
> Just a little remark:
>
> We have > 4000 connections in IDLE state(*) and idled works flawlessly.
> I had some headaches because some members of this list pointed out that
> imapd was not tested for thousands of c
Le 15/08/2011 17:28, David R Bosso a écrit :
>
> This is useful information, I was going to send out a query on idled
> experience because I recall that message a while ago stating that it was
> not well tested. Are there others using it on a large scale?
A "snapshot" of
This is useful information, I was going to send out a query on idled
experience because I recall that message a while ago stating that it was
not well tested. Are there others using it on a large scale?
Thanks.
-David
--On August 15, 2011 3:57:14 PM +0200 Pascal Gienger
wrote:
> Jus
Just a little remark:
We have > 4000 connections in IDLE state(*) and idled works flawlessly.
I had some headaches because some members of this list pointed out that
imapd was not tested for thousands of connections.
It justs works.
Cyrus IMAPD 2.3.19.
(*) due to a heavily migration
=atosorigin@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
[mailto:info-cyrus-bounces+christophe.zbierski=atosorigin@lists.andrew.cmu.edu]
De la part de jayesh.shinde
Envoyé : jeudi 23 juin 2011 09:40
À : info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Objet : ngnix + cyrus idled + blackberry working slow.
Hi All ,
I am getting problem
analysis we found that when Blackberry make a connection to nginx
server and then session is not maintain for long period for "idled"
protocol on both server. Because of this emails are not syncing
instantly on Blackberry.
I checked thunderbird email client with "idled" , the
10/15/07, Ian G Batten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12 Oct 07, at 1901, Ian G Batten wrote:
>
> > I've just brought up our 2.3.9 installation. My logs are filled with
> > `idled: unrecognized message: 3', happening around the time of
> > login. S
On 12 Oct 07, at 1901, Ian G Batten wrote:
> I've just brought up our 2.3.9 installation. My logs are filled with
> `idled: unrecognized message: 3', happening around the time of
> login. Should I worry?
Tracked that one down. In 2.2 you need --with-idle=idled. With 2.3
I've just brought up our 2.3.9 installation. My logs are filled with
`idled: unrecognized message: 3', happening around the time of
login. Should I worry?
ian
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/
Scott Adkins wrote:
cannot connect to saslauthd server: Connection refused
Failed to connect to socket /var/cyrus/imap/socket/lmtp for
local_cyrus_deliver
transport: Connection refused
error sending to idled: 0
The first thing I would do here is to use LMTP as a TCP socket instead of
--On Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:00 PM +0200 Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On 18. Oktober 2006 11:25:09 +0100 Adam Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We deployed idled here over the summer on our main staff IMAP server, a
Sunfire v480 running Solaris 8 an
--On 18. Oktober 2006 11:25:09 +0100 Adam Stephens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We deployed idled here over the summer on our main staff IMAP server, a
Sunfire v480 running Solaris 8 and cyrus-imap 2.2.12. It typically has
about 13,000 concurrent IMAP processes
Wow, that's a lot
Ken Murchison wrote:
Jorey Bump wrote:
Cyrus IMAP advertises IDLE, and the docs mention that the default method is
"poll", but shed little light on the use of idled as an alternative. Which
method is preferred, better performing (for users and/or servers), and
more robust?
Jorey Bump wrote:
Cyrus IMAP advertises IDLE, and the docs mention that the default method
is "poll", but shed little light on the use of idled as an alternative.
Which method is preferred, better performing (for users and/or servers),
and more robust?
idled will provide the c
Cyrus IMAP advertises IDLE, and the docs mention that the default method
is "poll", but shed little light on the use of idled as an alternative.
Which method is preferred, better performing (for users and/or servers),
and more robust?
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu
On 2006/02/19 20:30, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> In /etc/cyrus.conf I have:
> SERVICES {
> ...
> idle cmd="idled" listen="/var/lib/imap/socket/idle" prefork=0
> ...
> }
> But I continuously see messages in the log file like:
> imap[18492]:
Cyrus IMAPd 2.2.8
In /etc/cyrus.conf I have:
SERVICES {
...
idle cmd="idled" listen="/var/lib/imap/socket/idle" prefork=0
...
}
And in /etc/imapd.conf I have:
idlesocket: /var/lib/imap/socket/idle
And the idle socket exists and is being listened to:
sardine:/etc
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:05:22PM -0600, Richard Wohlstadter wrote:
> Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> >
> >Note that idled has nothing to do with IDLE support or not: IDLE is
> >always there. The only difference is in the method: without the daemon,
> >the check is done at
Andreas Hasenack wrote:
Note that idled has nothing to do with IDLE support or not: IDLE is
always there. The only difference is in the method: without the daemon,
the check is done at some poll interval (default 60s IIRC).
Is the IDLE daemon more reliable than the polling? I've notic
Quoting Murray Trainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi All,
I noticed the line in cyrus.conf below which was commented previously
and now included in SuSE 10.0:
# this is only necessary if using idled for IMAP IDLE
idled cmd="idled"
The IMAP IDLE feature sounds like a good id
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 08:22:01AM -0500, Scott Russell wrote:
> Simon Matter wrote:
> >>Hi All,
> >>
> >>I noticed the line in cyrus.conf below which was commented previously
> >>and now included in SuSE 10.0:
> >>
> >># this is only nec
Simon Matter wrote:
>> The IMAP IDLE feature sounds like a good idea - do any mail clients
>> support it yet. If so I will probably leave it on. Does this mean I
>> can tell my e-mail clients using IMAP not to check for new mail?
>
> At least current Mozillas (Thunderbird, Seamonkey...) use IDLE
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:00:25PM +0800, Murray Trainer wrote:
> The IMAP IDLE feature sounds like a good idea - do any mail clients
> support it yet.
The latest mutt version in Debian Sid has IMAP IDLE support. I did not
test it yet.
Gabor
--
---
Simon Matter wrote:
Hi All,
I noticed the line in cyrus.conf below which was commented previously
and now included in SuSE 10.0:
# this is only necessary if using idled for IMAP IDLE
idled cmd="idled"
The IMAP IDLE feature sounds like a good idea - do any ma
> Hi All,
>
> I noticed the line in cyrus.conf below which was commented previously
> and now included in SuSE 10.0:
>
> # this is only necessary if using idled for IMAP IDLE
> idled cmd="idled"
>
> The IMAP IDLE feature sounds like a good idea - do a
--On February 10, 2006 1:00:25 PM +0800 Murray Trainer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I noticed the line in cyrus.conf below which was commented previously
and now included in SuSE 10.0:
# this is only necessary if using idled for IMAP IDLE
idled cmd="idled"
Hi All,
I noticed the line in cyrus.conf below which was commented previously
and now included in SuSE 10.0:
# this is only necessary if using idled for IMAP IDLE
idled cmd="idled"
The IMAP IDLE feature sounds like a good idea - do any mail clients
support it yet. If so I wil
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different --with-idle
methods? Are there any rules of thumb on when one would be more
advisable to use than the others? Thanks.
Karl Boyken
--
Karl Boyken, system administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303A MLH, Dept. of Comp. Sci.
http://www.cs.ui
errors in /var/log/maillog
>From the versions I know you are using my rpms (or those RedHat now ships
with RHEL, which are based on mine). In recent packages, I have enabled
idled by default. Usually rpm handles the needed change on upgrade, but
you somehow prevented this from happening. This means
Oct 14 12:08:06 netserv pop3[17202]: error sending to idled: 2
Oct 14 12:08:08 netserv imap[4546]: error sending to idled: 1
Oct 14 12:08:08 netserv imap[4546]: error sending to idled: 0
Oct 14 12:08:08 netserv imap[16153]: error sending to idled: 2
Oct 14 12:08:11 netserv imap[7555]: error sending
It *is* enabled.
I even see the daemon "idled" in my processlist (ps -ef).
But for some reason pop3 got trouble to sending info to it.
Anyone any clues?
Op maandag 15 november 2004 11:32, schreef Carsten Hoeger:
> On Sat, Nov 13, Johan Barelds wrote:
> > After i upgraded Cyrus
On Sat, Nov 13, Johan Barelds wrote:
> After i upgraded Cyrus-imap 2.2.8-6 i got the following message in my message
> log:
>
> --
> Nov 13 21:52:56 beast pop3[8196]: error sending to idled: 2
> --
>
> I happens after someone pop's his email via cyrus pop3.
>
Hi all,
After i upgraded Cyrus-imap 2.2.8-6 i got the following message in my message
log:
--
Nov 13 21:52:56 beast pop3[8196]: error sending to idled: 2
--
I happens after someone pop's his email via cyrus pop3.
Anyone a clue what this could be?
Thanks!
--
Kind Regards / Met vriende
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Andreas wrote:
> Is it useful? Does it use too much resources? Is it not used that much,
> and as such not well tested?
Haven't really noticed it taking up too much resources myself.
In terms of it being useful, rather informal trial and error
experimentation here seemed to
What is the general perception towards the idled daemon? I see that
it is not used by default.
Is it useful? Does it use too much resources? Is it not used that much,
and as such not well tested?
I see that thunderbird 0.6 can use the IDLE extension and I like the idea
of the server notifying
I compiled cyrus with idled, and idled is enabled in cyrus.conf:
idled cmd="idled"
However, at every significant operation that i do from the IMAP client,
i get this error in syslog:
Feb 25 17:48:00 stantz imap[456]: error sending to idled: 2
What could be the cause?
Do i have to
s:
./configure --with-sasl=/usr/lib/sasl2/
--with-perl=/usr/bin/perl
--with-openssl
--with-auth=unix
--without-ucdsnmp
--with-idle=idled
--with-dbdir=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.1
Problem shows itself when linking the idled:
gcc -L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.1/lib
-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/Ber
=/usr/lib/sasl2/
--with-perl=/usr/bin/perl
--with-openssl
--with-auth=unix
--without-ucdsnmp
--with-idle=idled
--with-dbdir=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.1
Problem shows itself when linking the idled:
gcc -L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.1
--On Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:08 AM -0800 Ted Cabeen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# su - cyrus -c '/usr/cyrus/bin/idled -C /etc/imapd.conf'
bind: Address already in use
How do I figure out what exactly it is trying to bind to?
You could trace it. Do you see idled in the proc
--On Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:45 AM -0800 Ted Cabeen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SIGHUP'd the master. Nothing about idled appeared in the logs, I'm
still getting the 'error sending to idled' errors in syslog. Trying to
start by hand still gives:
I don't thi
Craig Constantine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --On Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:34 PM -0800 Ted Cabeen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Try changing the owner of the idle socket to cyrus. That's how I have
>> mine, and I reacll that I had tr
--On Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:34 PM -0800 Ted Cabeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Try changing the owner of the idle socket to cyrus. That's how I have
mine, and I reacll that I had trouble getting idled started because of
permissions.
nope. I changed it to:
# ls -ald /var/imap/
r/imap/socket/idle
> srwxrwxrwx1 root cyrus 0 Jun 17 22:24
> /var/imap/socket/idle
>
> ...and my 'master' process runs as cyrus as you'd expect.
Try changing the owner of the idle socket to cyrus. That's how I have
mine, and I reacll that I had t
--On Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:10 PM -0800 Ted Cabeen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What are the permissions on your idle socket and the directory that
the socket is in?
# ls -ald /var
drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Jun 17 21:36 /var
# ls -ald /var/imap
drwxrwsr-x 12 smmspcyrus
Craig Constantine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm running (compiled from source) Cyrus-imapd-2.1.13 on RedHat Linux
> 8.0 [all patched up to date.]
>
> With every incoming message I get the oft seen "error sending to
> idled" message in syslog facility loca
I'm running (compiled from source) Cyrus-imapd-2.1.13 on RedHat Linux 8.0
[all patched up to date.]
With every incoming message I get the oft seen "error sending to idled"
message in syslog facility local6. Cyrus is of course compiled to use
idled. :)
My cyrus.conf contain
Jay Levitt wrote:
>
> I'm using Outlook Express 6 with Cyrus 2.1.12. When I send an e-mail to
> myself, IDLED notifies the "user.jay.Sent Items" mailbox, but not the
> "user.jay.Inbox" mailbox. I verified that there is an open, IDLEing IMAP
> connec
I'm using Outlook Express 6 with Cyrus 2.1.12. When I send an e-mail to
myself, IDLED notifies the "user.jay.Sent Items" mailbox, but not the
"user.jay.Inbox" mailbox. I verified that there is an open, IDLEing IMAP
connection with Inbox SELECTed at the time. I tried to
Gautam Das wrote:
>
> Which is better - using idled or polling?
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&msg=19191
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP
Which is better - using idled or polling?
--
gd
Simon Matter wrote:
>
> Ken Murchison schrieb:
> >
> > Simon Matter wrote:
> > >
> > > I have enabled compilation of idled in my newest RPM but am wondering
> > > whether that was a good idea. I have two questions:
> > >
> > >
Ken Murchison schrieb:
>
> Simon Matter wrote:
> >
> > I have enabled compilation of idled in my newest RPM but am wondering
> > whether that was a good idea. I have two questions:
> >
> > 1) I was searching the archives and docs but still can't fin
Simon Matter wrote:
>
> I have enabled compilation of idled in my newest RPM but am wondering
> whether that was a good idea. I have two questions:
>
> 1) I was searching the archives and docs but still can't find a
> description of the advantages and drawbacks when
I have enabled compilation of idled in my newest RPM but am wondering
whether that was a good idea. I have two questions:
1) I was searching the archives and docs but still can't find a
description of the advantages and drawbacks when using idled instead of
poll. What are the drawback of pos
72 matches
Mail list logo
