On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 02:29:24AM -0700, David Wright wrote:
>
> > It's true, there isn't a need, meaning Cyrus could have been designed to
> > use PAM directly as a security layer and not used SASL.
>
> Huh? PAM is not a security layer. It is an API de
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 02:29:24AM -0700, David Wright wrote:
> It's true, there isn't a need, meaning Cyrus could have been designed to
> use PAM directly as a security layer and not used SASL.
Huh? PAM is not a security layer. It is an API designed for local
authentication only. On the other
> Because we think that there is no need to use SASL library in the
> middle of the way to authenticate via PAM+mysql. Isnt it a better
> performance issue? Or we are completely wrong?
It's true, there isn't a need, meaning Cyrus could have been designed to
use PAM directly as a security la
sandra wrote:
>
> Hi people,
>
> We have a question about athentication with cyrus+sasl.
> Here we had configured our cyrus installation to use SASL + PAM to
> authenticate users in a mysql database. We have read that there is
> a way to use IMAP LOGIN instead to authenticate users via
Hi people,
We have a question about athentication with cyrus+sasl.
Here we had configured our cyrus installation to use SASL + PAM to
authenticate users in a mysql database. We have read that there is
a way to use IMAP LOGIN instead to authenticate users via SASL PLAIN .
If it is
possible
