Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:> Quoting Scott Russell :> >> Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for >> them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after >> 2.3.1-3 which was tra
Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
Quoting Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for
them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after
2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to
back d
Quoting Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for
them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after
2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to
back down to 2.3.1-2. I'm not sure
> Greets.
>
> Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for
> them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after
> 2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to back
> down to 2.3.1-2. I'm not sure what became of t
Greets.
Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for
them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after
2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to back
down to 2.3.1-2. I'm not sure what became of those reports or if they