Re: cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1

2006-03-12 Thread Mark
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:> Quoting Scott Russell :> >> Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for >> them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after >> 2.3.1-3 which was tra

Re: cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1

2006-03-10 Thread Ken Murchison
Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: Quoting Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after 2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to back d

Re: cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1

2006-03-08 Thread Aleksandar Milivojevic
Quoting Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after 2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to back down to 2.3.1-2. I'm not sure

Re: cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1

2006-03-08 Thread Simon Matter
> Greets. > > Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for > them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after > 2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to back > down to 2.3.1-2. I'm not sure what became of t

cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1

2006-03-07 Thread Scott Russell
Greets. Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after 2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to back down to 2.3.1-2. I'm not sure what became of those reports or if they