Re: XFER ACL issue (Was: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6)

2006-08-02 Thread Ken Murchison
Wesley Craig wrote: I was tracking a very similar issue with xfer between 2.2 and 2.3.6. xfer'ing vanilla 2.2.12 mailboxes to 2.3.6 seems to work fine, and xfer'ing a 2.3.6 mailbox to 2.2.12 also more or less works (permissions are broken since 2.3.6 blindly uses rfc 4314 ACLs rather than payi

Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6

2006-07-06 Thread David S. Madole
Bron Gondwana wrote: One downside of your patch - it changes the network protocol of replication so that 2.3.6 and 2.3.7 won't be able to replicate to each other in either direction - you'll have to upgrade both your machines at once. I considered that and thought about making it compatible, b

Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6

2006-07-06 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:17:39 -0400, "David S. Madole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On 05 Jul 2006, at 02:54, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > >If you're running replication on any post 2.3.3 cyrus, your replica > >contains indexes with '0' as the modseq value. This means that your > >messages will not be

Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6

2006-07-06 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:56:45 -0400, "Wesley Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I was tracking a very similar issue with xfer between 2.2 and 2.3.6. > xfer'ing vanilla 2.2.12 mailboxes to 2.3.6 seems to work fine, and > xfer'ing a 2.3.6 mailbox to 2.2.12 also more or less works > (permissions

Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6

2006-07-06 Thread Wesley Craig
Looks like that changes the replication protocol incompatibly, so deployments need to update both replicas and primaries at the same time. :wes On 06 Jul 2006, at 17:17, David S. Madole wrote: I submitted a patch that does actually replicate the modseq value, although unfortunately my first e

Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6

2006-07-06 Thread David S. Madole
On 05 Jul 2006, at 02:54, Bron Gondwana wrote: If you're running replication on any post 2.3.3 cyrus, your replica contains indexes with '0' as the modseq value. This means that your messages will not be fetchable until you either fix that value or patch Cyrus. Reconstruct from 2.3.6+ is one o

Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6

2006-07-06 Thread Wesley Craig
I was tracking a very similar issue with xfer between 2.2 and 2.3.6. xfer'ing vanilla 2.2.12 mailboxes to 2.3.6 seems to work fine, and xfer'ing a 2.3.6 mailbox to 2.2.12 also more or less works (permissions are broken since 2.3.6 blindly uses rfc 4314 ACLs rather than paying attention to

Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6

2006-07-05 Thread Bron Gondwana
If I sound a little bitter, it's because I was up until 5:30am the other night after a hardware failure left us with corrupted filesystems on our master server, and fetching old messages from the replica returned blank responses. We eventually discovered that reconstruct could fix it, and 36(!!) h