Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-03 Thread Wesley Craig
On 03 Jul 2007, at 01:25, Janne Peltonen wrote: > I wonder where the mupdate process gets its fd limit from if it isn't > specified there. Does it inherit it from the shell that starts up > cyrus-master? Or is it set explicitely to some default value in > cyrus-master? I think cyrus-master may att

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-02 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:23:25PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote: > On 02 Jul 2007, at 06:53, Janne Peltonen wrote: > >But when try to imapsync the old server's data to the new one, with > >only > >one multi-threading mupdate master process, I keep getting 'connection > >to the master timed out' erro

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-02 Thread Wesley Craig
On 02 Jul 2007, at 06:53, Janne Peltonen wrote: > But when try to imapsync the old server's data to the new one, with > only > one multi-threading mupdate master process, I keep getting 'connection > to the master timed out' errors from the mupdate slaves. During your imapsync process, I might d

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-02 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:40:51PM +0200, Simon Matter wrote: > The patches between -4 and -7 are a cyrusdb_berkeley patch from CVS and > the pcreposix patch from FastMail.FM. I don't think they have any effect > in your situation, but maybe someone of FastMail.FM can tell you more. Yup, it was th

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-02 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:01:11AM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > ..the prefork numbers. Now this is something. I don't really know which one of > these is the one that matters, what is the resource that gets exhausted, why > it > gets exhausted etc. (and I sure as hope the problem only > manifes

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-01 Thread Simon Matter
> Hi! > > Using mutt, connecting via another backend, trying to create a folder > (ie. save a message to a new folder), result: > > imap_copy_messages [a0009 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox does not exist]? > > Connecting directly to the correct backend, result: > > Append messages to imaps://[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-06-30 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:11:56AM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > (Oh, the problem of not seeing the creation or deletion of mailboxes appears > to be > there still, even without the patches. To be more exact, the deletion problem > seems to be as follows: my client gets an acknowledgement that th

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-06-30 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:47:59PM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > The same goes with deletion: the mailboxes list of the proxying backend > (and, therefore, my client) sees doesn't get updated. Mm. When I restarted the system without the two patches (and run ctl_mboxlist and mupdate synch), there

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-06-30 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:47:59PM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > Restarting the mupdate master server causes all the slaves to > re-synchronize their mailboxes lists. (And this, in turn, generates > a substantial amount of write load.) And this seems to be the only way > to propagate the changes.

Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-06-30 Thread Janne Peltonen
Hi! Using mutt, connecting via another backend, trying to create a folder (ie. save a message to a new folder), result: imap_copy_messages [a0009 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox does not exist]? Connecting directly to the correct backend, result: Append messages to imaps://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.tataei