-Original Message-
From: Helmut Apfelholz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 19:37
To: Nick Ustinov; info-cyrus
Subject: RE: forking problem and SleepyCat
Could you please try turning off the DeliveryMode=q
in sendmail for some time, so we could see if the diff
has
sendmail.
>
>
>
> Nick Ustinov
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.videinfra.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Spark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 2:01 PM
> To: info-cyrus
> Subject: Re: forking problem and Sle
Hi,
we will try to apply the patch to our server in one -
two days time. This will provide some reall life
testing. Hopefully that will show something.
H.
--- Spark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We spent most of the day trying to simulate the load
> on the server and
> trying to do so
manage all
processes. However, I still have DeliveryMode=q in my sendmail.
Nick Ustinov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.videinfra.com
-Original Message-
From: Spark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 2:01 PM
To: info-cyrus
Subject: Re: forking problem and SleepyCat
Hello,
We spent most of the day trying to simulate the load on the server and
trying to do some measurements. It's quite hard to get conclusive
evidence to prove its faster or not. But most tests do show an increase
in speed, on average about a 15% increase. When the server is heavily
loaded
Spark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe somebody can comeup with change to the code that can implement this??
ok, the change is in cvs. I also included a diff below.
Please let us know if this makes things any better (or worse).
Walter
