Can we please stop this thread?
No offense, but it's absolutely disgusting and should have never gone
on this long. This Mailing list is Dedicated to Cyrus, we do not need
the rhetoric about Dovecot, or Courier, or Exchange. If you have
questions, ask them, if you need help, ask. There is
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2008, at 10:31, kbajwa wrote:
>> I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
>> type of
>> support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
>>
>> Cyrus = 0
>> Dovecot= 100
>
> As someone who answers many help
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian G Batten a écrit :
>> We have mailboxes.db and the metapartitions on ZFS, along with the zone
>> iteself. The pool is drawn from space on four 1rpm SAS drives
>> internal to the machine:
To give (hopefully) comparable comparison:
We have ou
Ian G Batten a écrit :
>> the mail, the indices, and the mailboxes.db. Each can be on
>> separate storage with optimal price vs performance characteristics
>> for the proposed load.
>
>
> We have 48000 mailboxes on behalf of 2000 users, with typically 1700
> imapd processes during the day and ~1
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 01:07:34PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2008, at 10:31, kbajwa wrote:
> > I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
> > type of
> > support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
> >
> > Cyrus = 0
> > Dovecot= 100
>
> As
On 13 Aug 2008, at 10:31, kbajwa wrote:
> I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
> type of
> support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
>
> Cyrus = 0
> Dovecot= 100
As someone who answers many help requests for cyrus (and I'm very far
from the on
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My personal experience.
Kirt
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.
Tornoci Laszlo a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Alain Spineux a écrit :
2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the
only
solutions that could fit our needs.
Pascal Gienger a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thanks you for your participation but not for the way you do it because
if you had read my second mail on this topic you wouldn't have to ask
your crystal sphere to wonder what is my configuration !!
I did miss your 2nd p
the mail, the indices, and the mailboxes.db. Each can be on
separate storage with optimal price vs performance characteristics
for the proposed load.
We have 48000 mailboxes on behalf of 2000 users, with typically 1700
imapd processes during the day and ~1000 overnight. There's about
3.4T
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
> Alain Spineux a écrit :
>> 2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> First of all : forgive me for my poor English
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the
>>> only
>>> solutions that could fit our needs.
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thanks you for your participation but not for the way you do it because
> if you had read my second mail on this topic you wouldn't have to ask
> your crystal sphere to wonder what is my configuration !!
I did miss your 2nd post, I am sorry.
J'ai m
Pascal Gienger a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok thanks ! A good point on the cyrus side !
What about the performance ?
Depends on which size your scenario will be.
Does my next configuration will run correctly ? Which hardware should I
buy for this activity ?
Tha
On 12 Aug 2008, at 06:53, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
> At present, we have a lot of I/O, we wonder if the last version of
> cyrus is improved for this point ?
Recent versions have several features designed to allow very large
scaling of I/O. In addition to optimization to the old architecture,
Adam Tauno Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have allot of users and allot of mail you are going to have allot
> of I/O. No way around that, regardless of the server. Cyrus' indexes
> headers better now, so that might help. But you still need adequate
> through-put. I've found that
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 12:53 +0200, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
The real question is because we have only 2 options :
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok thanks ! A good point on the cyrus side !
>
> What about the performance ?
Depends on which size your scenario will be.
> Does my next configuration will run correctly ? Which hardware should I
> buy for this activity ?
That's like asking a crys
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 12:53 +0200, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
> Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
> >> The real question is because we have only 2 options :
> >> Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
> > Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
> > to have a manag
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
The real question is because we have only 2 options :
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
to have a managed mail store. Cyrus is the only Open Source IMAP/POP
server I know of with
Hi,
Quoting Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Wesley Craig a écrit :
>> On 11 Aug 2008, at 08:57, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
what is in use now ?
>>> Cyrus
>>>
>>> Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
>>
>> Are you having a problem with Cyrus? Migrating from any server to
Wesley Craig a écrit :
On 11 Aug 2008, at 08:57, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
what is in use now ?
Cyrus
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Are you having a problem with Cyrus? Migrating from any server to any
other is likely to be challenging (to say the least), so you ought to
h
> The real question is because we have only 2 options :
> Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
to have a managed mail store. Cyrus is the only Open Source IMAP/POP
server I know of with any capacity to support data
On 11 Aug 2008, at 08:57, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
>> what is in use now ?
> Cyrus
>
> Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Are you having a problem with Cyrus? Migrating from any server to
any other is likely to be challenging (to say the least), so you
ought to have a pretty compe
Alain Spineux a écrit :
2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the only
solutions that could fit our needs.
Unfortunately I really don't know cyrus and I would l
2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First of all : forgive me for my poor English
>
> Hello all,
>
> I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the only
> solutions that could fit our needs.
> Unfortunately I really don't know cyrus and I would like to have som
25 matches
Mail list logo
