>Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:53:45 +0200 (CEST)
>From: Klaus Jaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>
>> I've thrown Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 on ftp.andrew.cmu.edu. I didn't test
>> the ancillary utilities as much as I would've liked
> (cyradm,
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:53:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Klaus Jaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> I've thrown Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 on ftp.andrew.cmu.edu. I didn't test
> the ancillary utilities as much as I would've liked (cyradm, etc.) but
> t
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> I've thrown Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 on ftp.andrew.cmu.edu. I didn't test
> the ancillary utilities as much as I would've liked (cyradm, etc.) but
> the base server should be solid.
>
> This version has some important db3 fixes, so I strongly encourage
Hello,
BTW, Has somebody examined the drac auth patch in Cyrus >= 2.0.15?.
Is it current?
I remember some problems with the patch in imapd.c with the
process reuse feature incorporated in 2.0.14. The changes file
of 2.0.15 reads:
"
Changes to the Cyrus IMAP Server since 2.0.14
...
* pop3d
Larry Greenfield writes:
>
>I've thrown Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 on ftp.andrew.cmu.edu. I didn't test
>the ancillary utilities as much as I would've liked (cyradm, etc.) but
>the base server should be solid.
Thanks. I've compiled it under Solaris 2.6, with very few problems,
and it runs quite nicely u
To answer a question I've received a few times:
The 2.1/altnamespace work will probably be released in August
sometime. We have to do a cvs merge (which I think Ken has down to a
science) and play around with it some.
After we release a 2.1, it's unlikely we'll go back and release any
more 2.0s
