Ken Murchison wrote:
When you authenticate, you need to use a SASL mech which supports
proxying. Look at doc/mechanisms.html in the SASL distro for a complete
list. In your case, you should be able to use at least PLAIN (you can
use others if using OpenLDAP 2.2's auxprop plugin). Here's how you
"John C. Amodeo" wrote:
>
> Rob,
>
> >Admin users can authorize as any user they want.
>
> I've heard this can be done...but how exactly? Does it have something
> to do with the 'proxy user' setting or something? What if sasl is
> patched for LDAP and does not authenticate locally against t
Rob,
>Admin users can authorize as any user they want.
I've heard this can be done...but how exactly? Does it have something
to do with the 'proxy user' setting or something? What if sasl is
patched for LDAP and does not authenticate locally against the sasldb?
Thanks,
-John
Rob Siemborski w
p.cyrus
Cc: "Cyrus Info (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Geographically Redundant mail stores
> We looked into a number of solutions to do what you're doing, and the
> best solution (within our budget)
We looked into a number of solutions to do what you're doing, and the
best solution (within our budget) was to use block level syncing
software like drbd (http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/reisner/drbd/)
with heartbeat (linux-ha). Basically replicates a all data written to
disc on the primary to
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Michael Fair wrote:
> Is there a reliable way to query the known list of users?
> I thinking of big loop:
> foreach $user (@users) { syncMailbox($user); }
As an admin, you can do a LIST "" "user.%", which will get you the list of
user inboxes, which is probably good enoug
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Michael Fair wrote:
>
> > I'm doing some work on how to create a somewhat
> > reliable geographically redundant mail system.
>
> Since I'm guessing you don't want to hear the reasons that this won't work
> (synchronizing UIDs and flags, for example, is hard), I won't go into
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Michael Fair wrote:
> I'm doing some work on how to create a somewhat
> reliable geographically redundant mail system.
Since I'm guessing you don't want to hear the reasons that this won't work
(synchronizing UIDs and flags, for example, is hard), I won't go into
that. Inste
Greetings all,
I'm doing some work on how to create a somewhat
reliable geographically redundant mail system.
The idea is that site A would be the primary site.
The MX record would point to a machine at that
site and everything would work as normal.
Then there'd be a site B. The backup site if
